ASMay 20, 2025
Pairwise Evaluation of Accent Similarity in Speech SynthesisJinzuomu Zhong, Suyuan Liu, Dan Wells et al.
Despite growing interest in generating high-fidelity accents, evaluating accent similarity in speech synthesis has been underexplored. We aim to enhance both subjective and objective evaluation methods for accent similarity. Subjectively, we refine the XAB listening test by adding components that achieve higher statistical significance with fewer listeners and lower costs. Our method involves providing listeners with transcriptions, having them highlight perceived accent differences, and implementing meticulous screening for reliability. Objectively, we utilise pronunciation-related metrics, based on distances between vowel formants and phonetic posteriorgrams, to evaluate accent generation. Comparative experiments reveal that these metrics, alongside accent similarity, speaker similarity, and Mel Cepstral Distortion, can be used. Moreover, our findings underscore significant limitations of common metrics like Word Error Rate in assessing underrepresented accents.
CLJun 13, 2024
An Initial Investigation of Language Adaptation for TTS Systems under Low-resource ScenariosCheng Gong, Erica Cooper, Xin Wang et al.
Self-supervised learning (SSL) representations from massively multilingual models offer a promising solution for low-resource language speech tasks. Despite advancements, language adaptation in TTS systems remains an open problem. This paper explores the language adaptation capability of ZMM-TTS, a recent SSL-based multilingual TTS system proposed in our previous work. We conducted experiments on 12 languages using limited data with various fine-tuning configurations. We demonstrate that the similarity in phonetics between the pre-training and target languages, as well as the language category, affects the target language's adaptation performance. Additionally, we find that the fine-tuning dataset size and number of speakers influence adaptability. Surprisingly, we also observed that using paired data for fine-tuning is not always optimal compared to audio-only data. Beyond speech intelligibility, our analysis covers speaker similarity, language identification, and predicted MOS.