Florian Brokhausen

Jossekin Beilharz, Philipp Wiesner, Arne Boockmeyer et al.

The continuous testing of small changes to systems has proven to be useful and is widely adopted in the development of software systems. For this, software is tested in environments that are as close as possible to the production environments. When testing IoT systems, this approach is met with unique challenges that stem from the typically large scale of the deployments, heterogeneity of nodes, challenging network characteristics, and tight integration with the environment among others. IoT test environments present a possible solution to these challenges by emulating the nodes, networks, and possibly domain environments in which IoT applications can be executed. This paper gives an overview of the state of the art in IoT testing. We derive desirable characteristics of IoT test environments, compare 18 tools that can be used in this respect, and give a research outlook of future trends in this area.

Kim Julian Gülle, Nicholas Ford, Patrick Ebel et al.

Requirements elicitation has recently been complemented with crowd-based techniques, which continuously involve large, heterogeneous groups of users who express their feedback through a variety of media. Crowd-based elicitation has great potential for engaging with (potential) users early on but also results in large sets of raw and unstructured feedback. Consolidating and analyzing this feedback is a key challenge for turning it into sensible user requirements. In this paper, we focus on topic modeling as a means to identify topics within a large set of crowd-generated user stories and compare three approaches: (1) a traditional approach based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation, (2) a combination of word embeddings and principal component analysis, and (3) a combination of word embeddings and Word Mover's Distance. We evaluate the approaches on a publicly available set of 2,966 user stories written and categorized by crowd workers. We found that a combination of word embeddings and Word Mover's Distance is most promising. Depending on the word embeddings we use in our approaches, we manage to cluster the user stories in two ways: one that is closer to the original categorization and another that allows new insights into the dataset, e.g. to find potentially new categories. Unfortunately, no measure exists to rate the quality of our results objectively. Still, our findings provide a basis for future work towards analyzing crowd-sourced user stories.