100.0COJun 1
The grid-minor theorem revisitedVida Dujmović, Robert Hickingbotham, Jędrzej Hodor et al.
We prove that for every planar graph $X$ of treedepth $h$, there exists a positive integer $c$ such that for every $X$-minor-free graph $G$, there exists a graph $H$ of treewidth at most $f(h)$ such that $G$ is isomorphic to a subgraph of $H\boxtimes K_c$. This is a qualitative strengthening of the Grid-Minor Theorem of Robertson and Seymour (JCTB 1986), and treedepth is the optimal parameter in such a result. As an example application, we use this result to improve the upper bound for weak coloring numbers of graphs excluding a fixed graph as a minor.
86.4COMay 27
Tree-partitions of graphs with given pathwidthDavid R. Wood
Graphs with bounded treewidth and bounded maximum degree are known to have tree-partitions of bounded width. What can be said if the bounded treewidth assumption is strengthened to bounded pathwidth? We prove that every graph with bounded pathwidth and bounded maximum degree has a tree-partition of bounded width, with the extra property that the underlying tree has bounded pathwidth. Moreover, we prove a lower bound showing that the bound on the pathwidth of the underlying tree is within a constant factor of optimal.
82.3COMay 11
The Dominating 4-Colour TheoremAntónio Girão, Freddie Illingworth, Bojan Mohar et al.
A "dominating $K_t$-model" in a graph $G$ is a sequence $(T_1,\dots,T_t)$ of pairwise vertex-disjoint connected subgraphs of $G$, such that whenever $1\leq i<j\leq t$ every vertex in $T_j$ has a neighbour in $T_i$. Replacing "every vertex in $T_j$" by "some vertex in $T_j$" retrieves the standard definition of $K_t$-model, which is equivalent to a $K_t$-minor in $G$. We prove that every graph with no dominating $K_5$-model is $4$-colourable. This generalises and is significantly stronger than the 4-colour theorem for planar graphs or for graphs with no $K_5$-minor. It also makes progress towards Hajós' conjecture on $K_5$-subdivisions in $5$-chromatic graphs.
92.9DMMay 7
Adjacency labelling for proper minor-closed graph classesVida Dujmović, Gwenaël Joret, Cyril Gavoille et al.
We show that every proper minor-closed class of graphs admits a $(1+o(1))\log_2 n$-bit adjacency labelling scheme. Equivalently, for every proper minor-closed class $\mathcal{G}$ and every positive integer $n$ there exists an $n^{1+o(1)}$-vertex graph $U$ such that every $n$-vertex graph in $\mathcal{G}$ is isomorphic to an induced subgraph of $U$. Both results are optimal up to the lower order term.
64.5COApr 9
Sparse String Graphs and Region Intersection Graphs over Minor-Closed Classes have Linear ExpansionNikolai Karol, David R. Wood
We prove that sparse string graphs in a fixed surface have linear expansion. We extend this result to the more general setting of sparse region intersection graphs over any proper minor-closed class. The proofs are combinatorial and self-contained, and provide bounds that are within a constant factor of optimal. Applications of our results to graph colouring are presented.
89.8COApr 8
Tree decompositions with small width, spread, order and degreeDavid R. Wood
Tree-decompositions of graphs are of fundamental importance in structural and algorithmic graph theory. The main property of tree-decompositions is the width (the maximum size of a bag $-1$). We show that every graph has a tree-decomposition with near-optimal width, plus several additional properties of interest. In particular every graph $G$ with treewidth at most $k$ has a tree-decomposition with width at most $72k+1$, where each vertex $v$ appears in at most $\text{deg}_G(v)+1$ bags, the number of bags is at most $\max\{\frac{|V(G)|}{2k},1\}$, and the tree indexing the decomposition has maximum degree at most 12. This improves exponential bounds to linear in a result of Ding and Oporowski [1995], and establishes a conjecture of theirs in a strong sense.
58.5COApr 7
Tree-partitions and small-spread tree-decompositionsMarc Distel, Neel Kaul, Raj Kaul et al.
Tree-decompositions and treewidth are of fundamental importance in structural and algorithmic graph theory. The "spread" of a tree-decomposition is the minimum integer $s$ such that every vertex lies in at most $s$ bags. A tree-decomposition is "domino" if it has spread 2, which is the smallest interesting value of spread. So that spread 1 becomes interesting, one can relax the definition of tree-decomposition to "tree-partition", which allows the endpoints of each edge to be in the same bag or adjacent bags, while demanding that each vertex appears in exactly one bag. Ding and Oporowski [1995] showed that every graph $G$ with treewidth $k$ and maximum degree $Î$ has a tree-partition with width $O(kÎ)$. We prove the same result with an improved constant, and with the extra property that the underlying tree has maximum degree $O(Î)$ and $O(|V(G)|/kÎ)$ vertices. This result implies (with an improved constant) the best known upper bound on the domino treewidth of $O(kÎ^2)$, due to Bodlaender [1999]. Moreover, solving an open problem of Bodlaender, we show this upper bound is best possible, by exhibiting graphs with domino treewidth $Ω(kÎ^2)$ for $k\geqslant 2$. On the other hand, allowing the spread to be a function of $k$, we show that width $O(kÎ)$ can be achieved. This result exploits a connection to chordal completions, which we show is best possible, a result of independent interest.