Lea Uhlenbrock

2papers

2 Papers

40.6CVJun 1
Chroma Clues: Leveraging Color Statistics to Detect Synthetic Images

Lea Uhlenbrock, Davide Cozzolino, Christian Riess

The evolution and dissemination of AI-synthesized images is occurring at an unprecedented rate. Image generators are making rapid progress in their goal of perfectly imitating natural images, which also challenges image forensics. In this work, we exploit an underexplored cue in current generative models, namely their weakness to imitate color statistics of natural images. We first show that the LPIPS loss used for training image generators is less sensitive to chrominance than to luminance, which may lead to statistical discrepancies in the colors of synthetic images. Building on this observation, we then introduce six hand-crafted color transformations and a method to learn a task-optimized color transform to statistically expose generated images. These transformations can be used in various ways. First, we define color-sensitive features at pixel-level or patch-level. A simple, interpretable classifier achieves with these features an average generalization accuracy of 93.27% and strong robustness against six types of post-processing. Second, we demonstrate that the transformations exhibit characteristic visual noise patterns in natural and synthetic image areas, which enables an intuitive visual image evaluation. Third, we demonstrate that the transforms can enhance color patterns in generated images for improved multiclass attribution.

12.1CRApr 7
SoK: Understanding Anti-Forensics Concepts and Research Practices Across Forensic Subdomains

Janine Schneider, Florian Ramming, Maximilian Eichhorn et al.

Anti-forensics includes a growing set of techniques designed to obstruct forensic analysis. While cybercriminals increasingly rely on these methods, they also help researchers identify and remedy weaknesses in forensic tools, advancing the overall robustness of digital forensics. Despite repeated efforts to define it, anti-forensics remains vague and inconsistent in its use. It also poses ethical challenges regarding the appropriateness of research practices and the legitimacy of the field itself. This article presents a systematic analysis of 123 publications on anti-forensics, combining qualitative and quantitative methods. We quantify the main techniques and attack vectors, examine their occurrence in different digital forensic subdomains, and identify typical research methods, motivations, and applications. This work also discusses what these findings mean for future research and proposes directions for building a more coherent and ethically grounded understanding of anti-forensics.