David R. Weir

Qiwei Peng, David Weir, Julie Weeds

Previous works have demonstrated the effectiveness of utilising pre-trained sentence encoders based on their sentence representations for meaning comparison tasks. Though such representations are shown to capture hidden syntax structures, the direct similarity comparison between them exhibits weak sensitivity to word order and structural differences in given sentences. A single similarity score further makes the comparison process hard to interpret. Therefore, we here propose to combine sentence encoders with an alignment component by representing each sentence as a list of predicate-argument spans (where their span representations are derived from sentence encoders), and decomposing the sentence-level meaning comparison into the alignment between their spans for paraphrase identification tasks. Empirical results show that the alignment component brings in both improved performance and interpretability for various sentence encoders. After closer investigation, the proposed approach indicates increased sensitivity to structural difference and enhanced ability to distinguish non-paraphrases with high lexical overlap.

Nestor Prieto-Chavana, Julie Weeds, David Weir

It is widely accepted that so-called facts can be checked by searching for information on the Internet. This process requires a fact-checker to formulate a search query based on the fact and to present it to a search engine. Then, relevant and believable passages need to be identified in the search results before a decision is made. This process is carried out by sub-editors at many news and media organisations on a daily basis. Here, we ask the question as to whether it is possible to automate the first step, that of query generation. Can we automatically formulate search queries based on factual statements which are similar to those formulated by human experts? Here, we consider similarity both in terms of textual similarity and with respect to relevant documents being returned by a search engine. First, we introduce a moderate-sized evidence collection dataset which includes 390 factual statements together with associated human-generated search queries and search results. Then, we investigate generating queries using a number of rule-based and automatic text generation methods based on pre-trained large language models (LLMs). We show that these methods have different merits and propose a hybrid approach which has superior performance in practice.

David Weir, Julie Weeds, Jeremy Reffin et al.

We present a new framework for compositional distributional semantics in which the distributional contexts of lexemes are expressed in terms of anchored packed dependency trees. We show that these structures have the potential to capture the full sentential contexts of a lexeme and provide a uniform basis for the composition of distributional knowledge in a way that captures both mutual disambiguation and generalization.

Thomas Kober, Julie Weeds, Jeremy Reffin et al.

Distributional models are derived from co-occurrences in a corpus, where only a small proportion of all possible plausible co-occurrences will be observed. This results in a very sparse vector space, requiring a mechanism for inferring missing knowledge. Most methods face this challenge in ways that render the resulting word representations uninterpretable, with the consequence that semantic composition becomes hard to model. In this paper we explore an alternative which involves explicitly inferring unobserved co-occurrences using the distributional neighbourhood. We show that distributional inference improves sparse word representations on several word similarity benchmarks and demonstrate that our model is competitive with the state-of-the-art for adjective-noun, noun-noun and verb-object compositions while being fully interpretable.