Wenshuang Li

You Peng, Youhe Jiang, Wenshuang Li et al.

Agentic LLM applications increasingly execute user requests as multi-step workflows involving planning, tool use, branching, refinement, and synthesis. In such settings, users experience the end-to-end latency of an entire workflow, not the latency of any single LLM call. In this paper, we study how to schedule online agentic workflows across heterogeneous prefill-decode disaggregated LLM serving clusters to efficiently meet workflow-level latency objectives. The problem is challenging because workflow dependencies are revealed incrementally at runtime, calls have heterogeneous prompts, outputs, and KV-cache requirements, and the prefill and decode stages impose different compute, memory, and transfer constraints across heterogeneous GPUs. To solve this problem, we present HexAGenT, a workflow-aware scheduler for a heterogeneous prefill-decode inference service. HexAGenT models each request as an online-revealed DAG, maintains a running estimate of the workflow's standalone completion horizon, prioritizes ready calls by projected risk of missing that horizon, and jointly selects prefill placement, decode placement, and local queue priority while accounting for KV-cache capacity and cross-stage transfer latency. Across representative agentic workloads and heterogeneous A100/H100/H200 clusters, HexAGenT reduces the SLO scale required for timely workflow completion by an average of 20.1% at 95% attainment and 33.0% at 99% attainment, with maximum reductions of 45.0% and 80.5%, respectively.

Youhe Jiang, Ran Yan, You Peng et al.

Modern Large Language Model (LLM) serving operates in highly volatile environments characterized by severe runtime dynamics, such as workload fluctuations and elastic cluster autoscaling. Traditional serving systems rely on static, human-engineered serving policies (e.g., scheduling algorithms and rescheduling strategies) to manage these dynamics. However, these policies must navigate deeply intertwined runtime trade-offs (e.g., scheduling overhead vs. execution efficiency, rescheduling frequency vs. reconfiguration overhead), whose optimal balance is workload-specific and shifts continuously as runtime conditions evolve, rendering any fixed policy fundamentally unable to adapt. We propose Autopoiesis, a novel online self-evolving system that shifts LLM serving from static policy deployment to continuous online policy evolution. First, Autopoiesis introduces an LLM-driven program synthesis workflow to evolve serving policies with respect to real-time observed dynamics, where the evolved policies reflect the optimal decision in navigating the complex, multi-dimensional trade-off space. Second, Autopoiesis enables this synthesis process to operate continuously during serving, observing real-world system behavior, and rewriting the policy code as runtime trade-offs shift, thereby transforming policy design from a one-time offline endeavor into an ongoing system component, enabling autonomous adaptation to evolving runtime conditions. Together, we establish a new paradigm: Serving policies are no longer static artifacts designed by humans before deployment, but living code that LLMs continuously evolve throughout deployment to navigate runtime trade-offs beyond human design. We evaluate Autopoiesis across diverse runtime dynamics and show up to 53% and on average 34% improvements over state-of-the-art LLM serving systems.