65.3ROMar 25
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Mechanical Intelligence: Summary ReportVictoria A. Webster-Wood, Nicholas Gravish, Amir Alavi et al.
This report provides a summary of the outcomes of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Mechanical Intelligence held in 2024. Mechanical Intelligence (MI) represents the phenomenon that novel structural features of material/biological/robotic systems can encode intelligence through responsiveness, adaptivity, memory, and learning in the mechanical structure itself. This is in contrast to computational intelligence, wherein the intelligence functions occur through electrical signaling and computer code. The two-day workshop was held at NSF headquarters on May 30-31 and included 38 invited academic researcher participants, and 8 program officers from the NSF. The workshop was structured around active small and large group discussions in groups of 4-5 and 9-10 with the goal of addressing topical questions on MI. Working groups entered notes into shared presentation slides for each discussion session and presented their outcomes in a final presentation on the last day. Here we summarize the overall outcomes of the workshop.
17.2ROApr 8
Characterizing the Resilience and Sensitivity of Polyurethane Vision-Based Tactile SensorsBenjamin Davis, Hannah Stuart
Vision-based tactile sensors (VBTSs) are a promising technology for robots, providing them with dense signals that can be translated into a multi-faceted understanding of contact. However, existing VBTS tactile surfaces make use of silicone gels, which provide high sensitivity but easily deteriorate from loading and surface wear. We propose that polyurethane rubber, a typically harder material used for high-load applications like shoe soles, rubber wheels, and industrial gaskets, may provide improved physical gel resilience, potentially at the cost of sensitivity. To compare the resilience and sensitivity of two polyurethane gel formulations against a common silicone baseline, we propose a series of repeatable characterization protocols. Our resilience tests assess sensor durability across normal loading, shear loading, and abrasion. For sensitivity, we introduce learning-free assessments of force and spatial sensitivity to directly measure the physical capabilities of each gel without effects introduced from data and model quality. We also include a bottle cap loosening and tightening demonstration to validate the results of our controlled tests with a real-world example. Our results show that polyurethane yields a more robust sensor. While it sacrifices sensitivity at low forces, the effective force range is largely increased, revealing the utility of polyurethane VBTSs over silicone versions in more rugged, high-load applications.