Alison Hsiang-Hsuan Liu

Bob Krekelberg, Alison Hsiang-Hsuan Liu, Fu-Hong Liu et al.

We study online scheduling to minimize total completion time with explorable uncertainty on single and multiple machines. Each job comes with an upper limit of its processing time, which could be potentially reduced by testing the job, which also takes time. The objective is to schedule all jobs with minimum total completion time. The challenge lies in deciding which jobs to test, the order of testing/processing jobs, and in multiple machine case which machine a job is allocated to. In multiple machine case, testing and processing of a job are allowed to be scheduled on different machines. Different settings have been studied before. In this work, we first consider the variable testing times setting. We enhance the analysis framework in Albers and Eckl (2020) and improve the analysis of the competitive ratio of their deterministic single machine algorithm from $4$ to $1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.4143$. Using the new analysis framework, we propose a new deterministic algorithm that further improves the competitive ratio to $2.316513$. The new framework also enables us to develop a randomized algorithm improving the expected competitive ratio from $3.3794$ to $2.152271$. We further show that with $m$~machines, by extending the framework of Gong et al. (2024), there exists a deterministic $2.77629-(0.45977/m)$-competitive algorithm and a randomized $2.51098-(0.3587/m)$-competitive algorithm. The performance of the algorithms on multiple machines when $m = 1$ matches the current best algorithms on a single machine for variable testing times shown in this paper.

Alison Hsiang-Hsuan Liu, Nikhil S. Mande

In the area of query complexity of Boolean functions, the most widely studied cost measure of an algorithm is the worst-case number of queries made by it on an input. Motivated by the most natural cost measure studied in online algorithms, the competitive ratio, we consider a different cost measure for query algorithms for Boolean functions that captures the ratio of the cost of the algorithm and the cost of an optimal algorithm that knows the input in advance. The cost of an algorithm is its largest cost over all inputs. Grossman, Komargodski and Naor [ITCS'20] introduced this measure for Boolean functions, and dubbed it instance complexity. Grossman et al. showed, among other results, that monotone Boolean functions with instance complexity 1 are precisely those that depend on one or two variables. We complement the above-mentioned result of Grossman et al. by completely characterizing the instance complexity of symmetric Boolean functions. As a corollary we conclude that the only symmetric Boolean functions with instance complexity 1 are the Parity function and its complement. We also study the instance complexity of some graph properties like Connectivity and k-clique containment. In all the Boolean functions we study above, and those studied by Grossman et al., the instance complexity turns out to be the ratio of query complexity to minimum certificate complexity. It is a natural question to ask if this is the correct bound for all Boolean functions. We show a negative answer in a very strong sense, by analyzing the instance complexity of the Greater-Than and Odd-Max-Bit functions. We show that the above-mentioned ratio is linear in the input size for both of these functions, while we exhibit algorithms for which the instance complexity is a constant.