Magnus Wahlström

Konrad K. Dabrowski, Peter Jonsson, Sebastian Ordyniak et al.

We show optimal FPT-approximability results for solving almost satisfiable systems of modular linear equations, completing the picture of the parameterized complexity and FPT-approximability landscape for the Min-$r$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ problem for every $r$ and $m$. In Min-$r$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$, we are given a system $S$ of linear equations modulo $m$, each on at most $r$ variables, and the goal is to find a subset $Z \subseteq S$ of minimum cardinality such that $S - Z$ is satisfiable. The problem is UGC-hard to approximate within any constant factor for every $r \geq 2$ and $m \geq 2$, which motivates studying it through the lens of parameterized complexity with solution size as the parameter. From previous work (Dabrowski et al. SODA'23/TALG and ESA'25) we know that Min-$r$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is W[1]-hard to FPT-approximate within any constant factor when $r \geq 3$, and that Min-$2$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is in FPT when $m$ is prime and W[1]-hard when $m$ has at least two distinct prime factors. The case when $m = p^d$ for some prime $p$ and $d \geq 2$ has remained an open problem. We resolve this problem in this paper and prove the following: (1) We prove that Min-$2$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_{p^d})$ is in FPT for every prime $p$ and $d \geq 1$. This implies that Min-$2$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_{m})$ can be FPT-approximated within a factor of $ω(m)$, where $ω$ is the number of distinct prime factors of $m$. (2) We show that, under the ETH, Min-$2$-Lin$(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ cannot be FPT-approximated within $ω(m) - ε$ for any $ε> 0$. Our main algorithmic contribution is a new technique coined balanced subgraph covering, which generalizes important balanced subgraphs of Dabrowski et al. (SODA'23/TALG) and shadow removal of Marx and Razgon (STOC'11/SICOMP). For the lower bounds, we develop a framework for proving optimality of FPT-approximation factors under the ETH.

Joshua Brakensiek, Venkatesan Guruswami, Bart M. P. Jansen et al.

The non-redundancy (NRD) of a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is a combinatorial quantity closely tied to the behavior of CSPs in various computational models including their sparsification, kernelization, and streaming complexity. A primary open question in the study of non-redundancy is the identification of which CSP predicates have near-linear NRD. Recent works by Carbonnel [CP 2022], Khanna, Putterman and Sudan [STOC 2025], Brakensiek and Guruswami [STOC 2025] and Brakensiek, Guruswami, Jansen, Lagerkvist, and Wahlström [2025] have introduced various forms of gadget reductions between CSPs to relate their non-redundancy. The primary contribution of this work is to recontextualize many of these gadget reductions in a framework which we call hypergraph projections. By studying a quantity we call the shrinking factor of these hypergraph projections, we can more precisely predict when a gadget reduction between predicates can yield a super-linear NRD lower bound, greatly improving on the analysis of previous works. To illustrate the power of our framework, we identify some concrete CSP predicates whose non-redundancy is at the cusp of our understanding and show how our methods give lower bounds that could not have been achieved with these previous methods. We also demonstrate how these gadget reductions can be automatically deduced using SAT solvers, thereby opening up novel computational avenues for discovering further relationships between the non-redundancy of various CSPs.