Thomas Klatzer

Marco Quantschnig, Yannick Werner, Sonja Wogrin et al.

Gas infrastructure datasets are essential inputs for energy system planning to support strategic decision-making toward decarbonization. However, relevant data are typically scattered across heterogeneous sources, including geospatial datasets, image-based infrastructure plans, and tabular data, making it complex, time-consuming, and error-prone to create topology-consistent network representations with existing tools.This paper presents QGas, an interactive toolkit for visualizing, creating, and collaboratively extending georeferenced gas infrastructure datasets. QGas integrates GIS-based geometry editing with topology-preserving graph operations in a unified web-based environment, enabling users to digitize infrastructure plans, edit network elements, manage attributes, and perform topology-consistent modifications while maintaining a georeferenced representation of the system. The toolkit is implemented using a modular architecture based on Python, JavaScript, and the Leaflet mapping library. An illustrative example demonstrates its application in extending a natural gas dataset to include hydrogen and CO2 infrastructure, highlighting QGas's capability to support the preparation of consistent multi-carrier gas infrastructure datasets for energy system planning.

Thomas Klatzer, Yannick Werner, Sonja Wogrin

This paper analyzes the implications of simplified pipeline gas flow models for integrated energy system planning. A case study of an integrated power-hydrogen expansion planning problem shows that simplifying pressure-flow relationships and gas dynamics can lead to expansion plans that incur substantial regret when evaluated under a more realistic dynamic gas flow model -- due to suboptimal system expansion, operation, and non-supplied hydrogen. Numerical experiments show that planning under the highly simplified transport and transport-linepack models -- commonly used in expansion studies -- can result in regret exceeding several thousand percent and yield expansion plans that lack robustness across demand levels. Planning under steady-state conditions partially mitigates these effects, but still leaves significant cost-reduction potential untapped compared to dynamic planning due to neglected linepack flexibility. Developing efficient solution algorithms for the dynamic model is a promising direction for future research.