4.2AIDec 2, 2024
A Neurosymbolic Fast and Slow Architecture for Graph ColoringVedant Khandelwal, Vishal Pallagani, Biplav Srivastava et al.
Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) present significant challenges to artificial intelligence due to their intricate constraints and the necessity for precise solutions. Existing symbolic solvers are often slow, and prior research has shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) alone struggle with CSPs because of their complexity. To bridge this gap, we build upon the existing SOFAI architecture (SOFAI_v1), which adapts Daniel Kahneman's ''Thinking, Fast and Slow'' cognitive model to AI. Our enhanced architecture, SOFAI_v2, integrates refined metacognitive governance mechanisms to improve adaptability across complex domains, specifically tailored here for solving the graph coloring problem, a specific type of CSP. SOFAI_v2 combines a fast System 1 (S1), leveraging LLMs, with a deliberative System 2 (S2), governed by a metacognition module. S1's initial solutions, often limited by constraint adherence issues, are improved through targeted feedback and examples from metacognition, aligning S1 more closely with CSP requirements. If S1 fails to resolve the problem, metacognition strategically invokes S2, ensuring accurate and reliable solutions. Our empirical results demonstrate that SOFAI_v2 achieves a 10.5% higher success rate and is up to 30% faster than a traditional symbolic solver in solving graph coloring problems.
1.2SYAug 30, 2021
Data-driven Small-signal Modeling for Converter-based Power SystemsFrancesca Rossi, Eduardo Prieto-Araujo, Marc Cheah-Mane et al.
This article details a complete procedure to derive a data-driven small-signal-based model useful to perform converter-based power system related studies. To compute the model, Decision Tree (DT) regression, both using single DT and ensemble DT, and Spline regression have been employed and their performances have been compared, in terms of accuracy, training and computing time. The methodology includes a comprehensive step-by-step procedure to develop the model: data generation by conventional simulation and mathematical models, databases (DBs) arrangement, regression training and testing, realizing prediction for new instances. The methodology has been developed using an essential network and then tested on a more complex system, to show the validity and usefulness of the suggested approach. Both power systems test cases have the essential characteristics of converter-based power systems, simulating high penetration of converter interfaced generation and the presence of HVDC links. Moreover, it is proposed how to represent in a visual manner the results of the small-signal stability analysis for a wide range of system operating conditions, exploiting DT regressions. Finally, the possible applications of the model are discussed, highlighting the potential of the developed model in further power system small-signal related studies.
E-PDDL: A Standardized Way of Defining Epistemic Planning ProblemsFrancesco Fabiano, Biplav Srivastava, Jonathan Lenchner et al.
Epistemic Planning (EP) refers to an automated planning setting where the agent reasons in the space of knowledge states and tries to find a plan to reach a desirable state from the current state. Its general form, the Multi-agent Epistemic Planning (MEP) problem involves multiple agents who need to reason about both the state of the world and the information flow between agents. In a MEP problem, multiple approaches have been developed recently with varying restrictions, such as considering only the concept of knowledge while not allowing the idea of belief, or not allowing for ``complex" modal operators such as those needed to handle dynamic common knowledge. While the diversity of approaches has led to a deeper understanding of the problem space, the lack of a standardized way to specify MEP problems independently of solution approaches has created difficulties in comparing performance of planners, identifying promising techniques, exploring new strategies like ensemble methods, and making it easy for new researchers to contribute to this research area. To address the situation, we propose a unified way of specifying EP problems - the Epistemic Planning Domain Definition Language, E-PDDL. We show that E-PPDL can be supported by leading MEP planners and provide corresponding parser code that translates EP problems specified in E-PDDL into (M)EP problems that can be handled by several planners. This work is also useful in building more general epistemic planning environments where we envision a meta-cognitive module that takes a planning problem in E-PDDL, identifies and assesses some of its features, and autonomously decides which planner is the best one to solve it.