Ylenia Nisticò

Hilton Marques Souza Santana, João Carlos Virgolino Soares, Sven Goffin et al.

Kalman filter-based algorithms are fundamental for mobile robots, as they provide a computationally efficient solution to the challenging problem of state estimation. However, they rely on two main assumptions that are difficult to satisfy in practice: (a) the system dynamics must be linear with Gaussian process noise, and (b) the measurement model must also be linear with Gaussian measurement noise. Previous works have extended assumption (a) to nonlinear spaces through the Invariant Extended Kalman Filter (IEKF), showing that it retains properties similar to those of the classical Kalman filter when the system dynamics are group-affine on a Lie group. More recently, the counterpart of assumption (b) for the same nonlinear setting was addressed in [1]. By means of the proposed Iterated Invariant Extended Kalman Filter (IterIEKF), the authors of that work demonstrated that the update step exhibits several compatibility properties of the classical linear Kalman filter. In this work, we introduce a novel open-source state estimation algorithm for legged robots based on the IterIEKF. The update step of the proposed filter relies solely on proprioceptive measurements, exploiting kinematic constraints on foot velocity during contact and base-frame velocity, making it inherently robust to environmental conditions. Through extensive numerical simulations and evaluation on real-world datasets, we demonstrate that the IterIEKF outperforms the vanilla IEKF, the SO(3)-based Kalman Filter, and its iterated variant in terms of both accuracy and consistency.

Ylenia Nisticò, João Carlos Virgolino Soares, Joan Solà et al.

We compare three state-of-the-art proprioceptive state estimators for quadruped robots: MUSE [1], the Invariant Extended Kalman Filter (IEKF) [2], and the Invariant Smoother (IS) [3], on the CYN-1 sequence of the GrandTour Dataset [4]. Our goal is to give practitioners clear guidance on accuracy and computation time: we report long-term accuracy (Absolute Trajectory Error, ATE), short-term accuracy (translational and rotational Relative Pose Error, RPE), and per-update computation time on a fixed hardware/software stack. On this dataset, RPEs are broadly similar across methods, while IEKF and IS achieve a lower ATE than MUSE. Runtime results highlight the accuracy-latency trade-offs across the three approaches. In the discussion, we outline the evaluation choices used to ensure a fair comparison and analyze factors that influence short-horizon metrics. Overall, this study provides a concise snapshot of accuracy and cost, helping readers choose an estimator that fits their application constraints, with all evaluation code and documentation released open-source at https://github.com/iit-DLSLab/state_estimation_benchmark for full reproducibility.