Xinglei Yu

Xinglei Yu, Zhenyang Liu, Shufeng Nan et al.

Diffusion policies are becoming mainstream in robotic manipulation but suffer from hard negative class imbalance due to uniform sampling and lack of sample difficulty awareness, leading to slow training convergence and frequent inference timeout failures. We propose VADF (Vision-Adaptive Diffusion Policy Framework), a vision-driven dual-adaptive framework that significantly reduces convergence steps and achieves early success in inference, with model-agnostic design enabling seamless integration into any diffusion policy architecture. During training, we introduce Adaptive Loss Network (ALN), a lightweight MLP-based loss predictor that quantifies per-step sample difficulty in real time. Guided by hard negative mining, it performs weighted sampling to prioritize high-loss regions, enabling adaptive weight updates and faster convergence. In inference, we design the Hierarchical Vision Task Segmenter (HVTS), which decomposes high-level task instructions into multi-stage low-level sub-instructions based on visual input. It adaptively segments action sequences into simple and complex subtasks by assigning shorter noise schedules with longer direct execution sequences to simple actions, and longer noise steps with shorter execution sequences to complex ones, thereby dramatically reducing computational overhead and significantly improving the early success rate.

Yixu Huang, Xinglei Yu, Zhongyu Wei

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at code generation but remain heavily reliant on large-scale annotated solutions and verification-based supervision, which constrains scalability and hinders sustained self-improvement. Recent solver--verifier frameworks exploit program execution as an automatic supervision signal, but their effectiveness degrades as solvers become moderately strong: verifier-generated tests increasingly confirm semantic correctness rather than exposing the remaining failure modes. We propose \textbf{ACE}, a self-evolving code generation framework based on a solver--adversary architecture that prioritizes active failure discovery through execution-centric supervision. A single LLM alternates between generating candidate programs and producing adversarial unit test inputs optimized to induce execution-level failures, such as runtime errors, exceptions, or non-termination. Supervision is derived solely from execution outcomes: robust programs are selected for supervised fine-tuning, while adversarial tests are optimized via Kahneman--Tversky Optimization using execution-derived preferences. Notably, the entire training loop requires no ground-truth code or external reward models. Experiments on CodeContests, MBPP, and LiveCodeBench demonstrate that ACE consistently outperforms strong solver--verifier baselines, achieving 3--7\% absolute gains in pass@1, with larger improvements on out-of-distribution benchmarks, while maintaining competitive or improved inference efficiency.