Ayon Dey

Andrei Dumitriu, Aakash Ralhan, Florin Miron et al.

This report presents the NTIRE 2026 Rip Current Detection and Segmentation (RipDetSeg) Challenge, which targets automatic rip current understanding in images. Rip currents are hazardous nearshore flows that cause many beach-related fatalities worldwide, yet remain difficult to identify because their visual appearance varies substantially across beaches, viewpoints, and sea states. To advance research on this safety-critical problem, the challenge builds on the RipVIS benchmark, evaluating both detection and segmentation. The dataset is diverse, sourced from more than $10$ countries, with $4$ camera orientations and diverse beach and sea conditions. This report describes the dataset, challenge protocol, evaluation methodology, final results, and summarizes the main insights from the submitted methods. The challenge attracted $159$ registered participants and produced $9$ valid test submissions across the two tasks. Final rankings are based on a composite score that combines $F_1[50]$, $F_2[50]$, $F_1[40\!:\!95]$, and $F_2[40\!:\!95]$. Most participant solutions relied on pretrained models, combined with strong augmentation and post-processing design. These results suggest that rip current understanding benefits strongly from the robust general-purpose vision models' progress, while leaving ample room for future methods tailored to their unique visual structure.

Abdullah Naeem, Md Wasi Ul kabir, Manish Bhatt et al.

We present ARES-LSHADE, a memetic differential-evolution variant submitted to the GECCO 2026 competition on LLM-designed evolutionary algorithms for the Generalized Numerical Benchmark Generator (GNBG). The algorithm builds on the LLM-LSHADE 2025 winner, contributing two new components: (a) a scout-augmented mutation operator with adaptive CMA-ES integration, produced by an autonomous research loop across approximately thirty LLM-driven design experiments, and (b) a multi-start L-BFGS-B polish phase that respects strict blackbox treatment of the benchmark. On the official 31-run-per-function evaluation with the competition-specified function-evaluation budgets, ARES-LSHADE obtains 510 of 744 wins (per-function gap below 1e-8), reaching machine precision on 18 of 24 functions. The remaining six functions exhibit characteristic plateau signatures consistent with GNBG's compositional structure, and were independently identified by the autoresearch loop as the hardest of the suite. Beyond the result itself, this report documents two methodological observations: (i) an LLM-driven research loop with operator-only edit surface and fitness-only observation space converges to a characteristic plateau on this benchmark; (ii) when we initially widened the observation space to include the benchmark's compositional metadata, the resulting algorithm trivially solved all 24 functions but violated the competition's blackbox rule, which we identified before submission. We discuss this tension between LLM capability and benchmark integrity as a design consideration for future LLM-driven optimization-algorithm research. Code and reproducibility artifacts are available at https://github.com/anaeem1/ARES-LSHADE.