Benjamin Merlin Bumpus

Benjamin Merlin Bumpus, Rod Downey, Tala Eagling-Vose et al.

Parameterized complexity has always been concerned with practical computing: by confining combinatorial explosion to a secondary parameter $k$, one can uncover why and how many NP-hard problems are effectively tackled in practice. Today, however, the scale of data has changed: scientists study Big Data, which is so large that even quadratic dependence in the total input size $n$ is unaffordable. Therefore, what constitutes a practical algorithm has also changed. Classically, parameterized complexity is blind to the difference between defining fixed parameter tractability multiplicatively (i.e. $f(k) \cdot n^c$) or additively (i.e. $f(k) + n^c$). But what if the constant $c$ is one and we require true linearity, is this distinction still inconsequential? Here, we define and explore Truly Linear FPT (TLFPT) -- that is $O(n)+f(k)$ -- and show that it is a strict subset of Linear FPT (LFPT) -- that is $O(n) \cdot f(k)$ -- via diagonalization. Populating TLFPT requires careful consideration of linear-time algorithmics and data structures. We meet many inhabitants of TLFPT: SAT, Vertex Cover, Min-Max Matching, $(n-k)$-Coloring, Diverse Pair of Matchings, $k$-Path, and $H$-Coloring. Our parameterizations are equally varied. Beyond classical parameters like solution size, we leverage two parameters, treedepth and BFS-width, which are particularly well-suited to the TLFPT regime. We do so by developing techniques based on depth- and breadth-first search. For parameterized complexity to be of service to the scientific community, we need to contend with Big Data. For sufficiently large inputs, FPT beyond linear may not suffice. Thus, there is a practical and theoretical need for more ambitious goals. TLFPT is a first step forward.

Ernst Althaus, Benjamin Merlin Bumpus, James Fairbanks et al.

A limit of a (small) diagram $d : J \to E$ in a complete category $E$ can be thought of as specifying a set of equations involving the objects of $E$. To motivate this intuitively, one can think of each object $d(j)$ as a "variable" and each morphism in $J$ as a "constraint" connecting these variables. If $E$ has an initial object, a natural question arises: does our set of equations have any solution at all? Equivalently, we can ask: is the limit of $d$ initial? In this paper we consider the computational problem that, given finite diagram $d$ in a finitely complete category $E$, asks whether its limit is empty. We construct a fast algorithm (in the sense of parameterized complexity theory) that solves this problem when $E$ is of the form $\mathbf{FinSet}^{J}$ for a finite category $J$ and $d$ is a structured co-decomposition, i.e. a diagram arising from the opposite of the Grothendieck construction of a simple graph.

Benjamin Merlin Bumpus, James Fairbanks, Martti Karvonen et al.

What is a time-varying graph, a time-varying topological space, or, more generally, a mathematical structure that evolves over time? In this work, we lay the foundations for a general theory of temporal data by introducing categories of narratives. These are sheaves on posets of time intervals that encode snapshots of a temporal object along with the relationships between them. This theory satisfies five desiderata distilled from the burgeoning field of time-varying graphs: (D1) it defines both time-varying objects and their morphisms; (D2) it distinguishes between cumulative and persistent interpretations and provides principled methods for transitioning between them; (D3) it systematically lifts static notions to their temporal analogues; (D4) it is object agnostic; (D5) it integrates with theories of dynamical systems. To achieve this, we build upon existing categorical and sheaf-theoretic approaches to temporal graph theory, generalizing them to any category with limits and colimits. We also formalize tacit intuitions that, while present, often remain implicit in temporal graph theory. Beyond synthesizing and reformulating existing ideas in categorical language, we introduce sheaf-theoretic constructions and prove results that, to our knowledge, have not appeared in the temporal data literature - such as the adjunction between persistent and cumulative narratives. More importantly, we integrate these existing and novel elements into a consistent and coherent framework, setting the stage for a unified theory of time-varying data.