Ekaterina S. Ivshina

Bruno Trentini, Jacob Hume, Vincenzo Antonio Isoldi et al.

Point cloud learning often rests on the premise that observed samples are noisy traces of an underlying geometric object, such as a manifold embedded in a high-dimensional feature space. Yet much of this geometry is not captured directly by coordinates, pairwise distances, or learned graph neighborhoods alone. In the smooth setting, differential forms are devices to encode higher order tangency information. In this work, we introduce a new family of principled learnable geometric features for point clouds called neural point-forms (NPFs). In the absence of a natural tangency structure, we instead use Laplacian-based techniques from Diffusion Geometry to build a discrete model for comparing differential forms on point clouds via inner products. In the continuum, submanifolds of a shared ambient feature space are represented as comparison matrices, whose entries describe how pairs of feature forms interact with extrinsic tangency information. We make this intuition precise by proving the long-run consistency of comparison matrices under standard sampling, bandwidth, density, and manifold-hypothesis assumptions. This yields a compact, efficient and permutation-invariant neural layer whose output is a learned form-comparison matrix. Across synthetic and biologically relevant experiments, we show that NPFs provide a competitive, and interpretable representation, with the strongest benefits appearing when labels depend on sampling density, manifold-like structure, or response-relevant population geometry.

James V. Roggeveen, Erik Y. Wang, Will Flintoft et al.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in mathematical problem-solving, but evaluation has largely focused on problems that have exact analytical solutions or involve formal proofs, often overlooking approximation-based problems ubiquitous in applied science and engineering. To fill this gap, we build on prior work and present HARDMath2, a dataset of 211 original problems covering the core topics in an introductory graduate applied math class, including boundary-layer analysis, WKB methods, asymptotic solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations, and the asymptotics of oscillatory integrals. This dataset was designed and verified by the students and instructors of a core graduate applied mathematics course at Harvard. We build the dataset through a novel collaborative environment that challenges students to write and refine difficult problems consistent with the class syllabus, peer-validate solutions, test different models, and automatically check LLM-generated solutions against their own answers and numerical ground truths. Evaluation results show that leading frontier models still struggle with many of the problems in the dataset, highlighting a gap in the mathematical reasoning skills of current LLMs. Importantly, students identified strategies to create increasingly difficult problems by interacting with the models and exploiting common failure modes. This back-and-forth with the models not only resulted in a richer and more challenging benchmark but also led to qualitative improvements in the students' understanding of the course material, which is increasingly important as we enter an age where state-of-the-art language models can solve many challenging problems across a wide domain of fields.