Lucas Hegerath

2papers

2 Papers

14.2ROApr 23Code
Ufil: A Unified Framework for Infrastructure-based Localization

Simon Schäfer, Lucas Hegerath, Marius Molz et al.

Infrastructure-based localization enhances road safety and traffic management by providing state estimates of road users. Development is hindered by fragmented, application-specific stacks that tightly couple perception, tracking, and middleware. We introduce Ufil, a Unified Framework for Infrastructure-Based Localization with a standardized object model and reusable multi-object tracking components. Ufil offers interfaces and reference implementations for prediction, detection, association, state update, and track management, allowing researchers to improve components without reimplementing the pipeline. Ufil is open-source C++/ROS 2 software with documentation and executable examples. We demonstrate Ufil by integrating three heterogeneous data sources into a single localization pipeline combining (i) vehicle onboard units broadcasting ETSI ITS-G5 Cooperative Awareness Messages, (ii) a lidar-based roadside sensor node, and (iii) an in-road sensitive surface layer. The pipeline runs unchanged in the CARLA simulator and a small-scale CAV testbed, demonstrating Ufil's scale-independent execution model. In a three-lane highway scenario with 423 and 355 vehicles in simulation and testbed, respectively, the fused system achieves lane-level lateral accuracy with mean lateral position RMSEs of 0.31 m in CARLA and 0.29 m in the CPM Lab, and mean absolute orientation errors around 2.2°. Median end-to-end latencies from sensing to fused output remain below 100 ms across all modalities in both environments.

3.1SEApr 24
A Comparison of ROS 2 and AUTOSAR Adaptive Platform Against Industry-Elicited Automotive Middleware Requirements

Lucas Hegerath, David Philipp Klüner, Philipp Pelcz et al.

In software-defined vehicles, automotive middleware plays a fundamental role in enabling efficient communication, integration, and coordination among software components. This paper examines how well two of the currently most popular middleware frameworks, ROS 2 Jazzy and AUTOSAR Adaptive Platform R24-11, meet practical requirements elicited from automotive software engineers at one of the major automotive supplier companies, ZF Group. Our objective is to provide insight into an otherwise difficult-to-obtain industrial perspective and support a clearer understanding of priorities in the development and evaluation of middleware for automotive applications.