Santiago Ojeda-Ramirez

Santiago Ojeda-Ramirez, Eva Durall Gazulla, Kylie Peppler

Who gets to decide how generative AI tools enter students' classrooms? We report on a five-week participatory design program in which three 11th-grade Latinx students and three high school teachers in California negotiated how generative AI tools would be used and taught about in learning environments. Drawing on video recordings and designed artifacts, we ask: what critical AI literacy practices emerged as students and teachers jointly designed how generative AI tools would be used and taught about? Our analysis reveals three practices: collectively unsettling assumptions about AI, mutual learning through complementary expertise, and grounding AI critique in cultural knowledge and creative practice. Students and teachers developed these practices through the design work itself. This case contributes strategies for designing with youth around an emergent technology like generative AI toward critical AI literacy. It extends work on youth as protagonists by showing how this approach enables students to shape both the adoption and the interrogation of these tools in their learning environments.

Santiago Ojeda-Ramirez, Symone Gyles, Kylie Peppler

As generative AI systems increasingly mediate learning, they are often treated as authoritative sources of knowledge. This perspective paper introduces community-based AI learning as a framework that repositions authority, grounding AI engagement in learners' lived and community-based epistemologies. Drawing from community-driven learning and constructionist traditions, we articulate three commitments: epistemic fine tuning, redistribution of authority, and situated discernment. Together, these processes localize critical AI literacy by calibrating trust, foregrounding community knowledge, and supporting collective judgment about when to design with, interrogate, or reject AI. We argue that equitable AI education requires negotiating authority through place, history, and social context.