Clara Lerouvillois

Philippe Balbiani, Hans van Ditmarsch, Clara Lerouvillois

We investigate a logic for asynchronous announcements wherein the sending of the messages by the environment is separated from their reception by the individual agents. Both come with different modalities. In the logical semantics, formulas are interpreted in a world of a Kripke model but given a history of prior announcements and receptions that already happened. An axiomatisation AA for such a logic has been given in prior work, for the formulas that are valid when interpreted in the Kripke model before any such announcements have taken place. This axiomatisation is a reduction system wherein one can show that every formula is equivalent to a purely epistemic formula without dynamic modalities for announcements and receptions. We propose a generalisation AA* of this axiomatisation, for the formulas that are valid when interpreted in the Kripke model given any history of prior announcements and receptions of announcements. It does not extend the axiomatisation AA, for example it is no longer valid that nobody has received any message. Unlike AA, this axiomatisation AA* is infinitary and it is not a reduction system.

Clara Lerouvillois, Francesca Poggiolesi

Dynamic Epistemic Logic extends classical epistemic logic by modeling not only static knowledge but also its evolution through information updates. Among its various systems, Public Announcement Logic (PAL) provides one of the simplest and most studied frameworks for representing epistemic change. While the semantics of PAL is well understood as transformation of Kripke models, the proof theory so far developed fails to represent this dynamism in purely syntactical terms. In this paper we propose a step toward addressing this gap. In particular, building on a hypersequent calculus for S5, we extend it with a mechanism that models the transition between epistemic models induced by public announcements. We call these structures dynamic hypersequents. Using dynamic hypersequents, we construct a calculus for PAL and we show that it enjoys several desirable properties: admissibility of all structural rules (including contraction), invertibility of logical rules, as well as syntactic cut-elimination.