Seong-hun Kim

Won Ik Cho, Seong-hun Kim, Geunhye Kim

This position paper argues that adopting AI in organizational practice does not guarantee productivity gains, because human and environmental factors critically moderate the relationship between AI deployment and realized productivity improvements. Following the advent of high-performance generative models, AI use has been rapidly encouraged in some sectors while being restricted in others. Most practitioners assume that AI brings productivity boosts owing to enhanced technical capabilities, but regardless of apparent performance advances in AI technology, human and environmental factors of the organization may substantially attenuate -- or even negate -- the effective productivity benefits. We identify five key moderating factors: human resource composition, baseline capability of individuals, learning curve of practitioners, incentives for fair use, and flexibility of objectives. Drawing on the partial equilibrium model of Gries and Naudé (2022), we argue that existing economic frameworks may inadvertently overlook these factors. We revise the existing framework to redefine effective organizational determinants and shed light on practical implications including industry and education, responding to alternative views and calling for action of stakeholders.

Minkyu Kim, Vincent-Daniel Yun, Youngrae Kim et al.

Depth pruning improves the inference efficiency of large language models by removing Transformer blocks. Prior work has focused on importance criteria and search algorithms, often treating layer redundancy as an inherent structural property of pretrained networks. In contrast, we adopt a \emph{functional perspective}, where redundancy is jointly influenced by the model and the evaluation objective, suggesting that a universal ranking may not be sufficient. Through an empirical study across three LLM families, two calibration objectives, and seven search algorithms, we observe that different objectives yield qualitatively different redundant layers, and that perplexity and downstream accuracy rankings do not consistently align. Under a fixed objective, however, search algorithms tend to produce similar solutions. Overall, our results suggest that the calibration objective may play a more influential role than the choice of search algorithm, indicating that further attention to objective design could be beneficial.