Vabuk Pahari

Andrea Canidio, Vabuk Pahari

Blockchain's economic value lies in enabling financial and economic transactions without relying on trusted, centralized intermediaries. In practice, however, transactions pass through a fragmented chain of intermediaries before being included on-chain. Because standard blockchain data reveal only the winning block, this process is largely unobservable. We address this limitation by constructing a novel dataset of 15,097 non-winning Ethereum blocks, that is, blocks proposed but not selected for inclusion. We show that 21% of user transactions are delayed: they appear in candidate blocks but not in the winning block, implying that fragmented routing materially affects inclusion time. We further show that execution quality varies substantially across candidate blocks: for the same swap, both execution probability and execution price differ across proposed blocks. To study these differences, we examine competition between two arbitrage bots trading between decentralized and centralized exchanges. We find that, conditional on inclusion in a block that also contains transactions from these bots, user swaps in the same (opposite) direction are less likely (more likely) to execute and receive worse (better) prices. These results show that routing and block composition are central determinants of execution quality and market quality in on-chain markets.

Vabuk Pahari, Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran, Johnnatan Messias et al.

A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) is a governing entity that empowers its stakeholders (i.e., users who hold one or more of its tokens) to manage blockchain-based protocols (i.e., smart contracts) collaboratively. The governance of a DAO is explicitly encoded in the DAO's governance contract, which defines how stakeholders participate in governance and how much influence (or voting power) they have in any decision. While decentralization and autonomy are the fundamental tenets of a DAO's design, empirical evidence suggests that in practice governance is often highly centralized. In this work, we study the designs and implementations of 48 public and actively used DAOs, with substantially large capital, deployed on Ethereum. We identify how three key governance mechanisms--token registration, staking, and delegation--originally introduced to improve security or participation, contribute to the concentration of voting power. Unlike prior work on centralization of voting power in specific DAOs, our findings reveal that these governance mechanisms of DAOs themselves systematically reinforce centralization. By elucidating the relationship between governance design and voting centralization, this work advances the understanding of DAO governance structures and highlights the inherent trade-offs between decentralization, security, and usability of DAOs.