Purna Sai Garigipati

Purna Sai Garigipati, Onur Ayan, Kishor Chandra Joshi et al.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) will play an essential role in 6G. It will fundamentally reshape the network architecture itself and drive major changes in the design of network entities, interfaces, and procedures. The adoption of agentic AI in next-generation networks is expected to enhance network intelligence and autonomy through agents capable of planning, reasoning, and acting, while also opening up new business opportunities. Under this vision, existing network functions are expected to evolve into AI-enabled agents and tools that deliver both connectivity and beyond-connectivity services. As an initial attempt to move toward this vision, this paper presents a tool-based interface design and an experimental prototype that are based on agentic AI for the mobile core network, with the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and the Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol as foundational protocols. MCP is selected to design the interface between the agent and network tools, and the A2A protocol is used for message exchange between AI agents. In such an experimental setup, we analyze packet-level message flows between the agents, tools, and network functions and break down the latency of end-to-end operations, starting from the prompt injection until the completion of the input task. This work demonstrates how an AI agent-based core network combined with network-specific tools can be utilized in next generation mobile systems to execute intent-based tasks.

Purna Sai Garigipati, Onur Ayan, Kishor Chandra Joshi et al.

Agentic AI will be an essential enabling technology for designing future mobile communication systems, which could provide flexible and customized services, automate complex network operations, and drive autonomous decision-making across the network. This work studies how Large Language Model (LLM)-based network AI agents can be utilized to execute network procedures expressed as sequences of tool invocations. We investigate four approaches, which differ in how the agent obtains the procedure and in how execution is distributed between the agent and the underlying tools. We evaluated the latency and execution correctness across these approaches using a User Equipment (UE) IP allocation procedure as a case study. Furthermore, we conduct a stress test to examine how many sequential procedural steps an LLM agent can reliably execute before failure. Our results show that approaches relying on iterative agent-side reasoning incur higher latency and are more prone to execution errors, while approaches where the procedure is encapsulated within a single tool, which internally orchestrates the required steps by invoking other tools, reduce latency by limiting repeated reasoning. The stress-test results further show that the model with advanced tool-calling capability maintains reliable execution over longer procedures than the other evaluated models; however, all models exhibit reliability degradation as procedure length increases, revealing clear execution limits in multi-step tool-based workflows. To systematically analyze failures in procedure execution, we introduce a procedure-specific error taxonomy that categorizes deviations in multi-step procedural execution.