Davide Sangiorgi

Guilhem Jaber, Davide Sangiorgi

We establish a tight connection between two models of the $λ$-calculus, namely Milner's encoding into the $π$-calculus (precisely, the Internal $π$-calculus), and operational game semantics (OGS). We first investigate the operational correspondence between the behaviours of the encoding provided by $π$ and OGS. We do so for various LTSs: the standard LTS for $π$ and a new `concurrent' LTS for OGS; an `output-prioritised' LTS for $π$ and the standard alternating LTS for OGS. We then show that the equivalences induced on $λ$-terms by all these LTSs (for $π$ and OGS) coincide. We also prove that when equivalence is based on complete traces, the `concurrent' and `alternating' variants of OGS also coincide with the `well-bracketed' variant. These connections allow us to transfer results and techniques between $π$ and OGS. In particular: we import up-to techniques from $π$ onto OGS; we derive congruence and compositionality results for OGS from those of $π$; we transport the notion of complete traces from OGS onto $π$, obtaining a new behavioural equivalence that yields a full abstraction result for the encoding of $λ$-terms with respect to contexts written in a $λ$-calculus extended with store. The study is illustrated for both call-by-value and call-by-name.

Ken Sakayori, Davide Sangiorgi, Simon Castellan et al.

We introduce a dialect of the Asynchronous pi-calculus, called AWpi, in which (1) an input name may be owned, at any time, by at most one process; (2) each name has either only the input or only the output capability. As a result, special processes called wires (aka forwarders, that is, processes that receive values at one name and re-transmit) behave as substitutions when composed with any AWpi process. Thus AWpi naturally yields a category, whose morphisms are AWpi processes (modulo the reference behavioural equivalence, barbed congruence) and whose objects are types; and where wires act as identity morphisms. We show that the category of processes can be further organised into (sub)categories with the structures needed for the interpretation of common higher-order language features in the literature by drawing on insights from game semantics; notably, we construct a relative Seely category, the categorical structure that concurrent game semantics has. At the same time, AWpi follows the tradition of ordinary pi-calculi in that expressiveness is preserved and the operational and algebraic theory are developed in a similar manner, notwithstanding substantial technical differences in their development and proofs. In short, the goal of AWpi is to remain faithful to the operational and algebraic tradition of the pi-calculi while connecting to the tradition of denotational models for programming languages.