Lukas Hintze

Petra Berenbrink, Colin Cooper, Thorsten Götte et al.

We analyze the discrete incremental voting process (DIV) introduced by Cooper, Radzik, and Shiraga [OPODIS '23]. In this process, we consider a set $V$ of $n$ nodes connected in an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$ where each node has an integer opinion. In one step a randomly selected node interacts with its randomly selected neighbor and changes its opinion by $1$ in the direction of the neighbour's opinion. The process converges to a unique opinion that, in expectation, is the degree-weighted average of the initial opinions. We show that if the graph has conductance $Φ(G)$, the ratio of the average to smallest degree is $γ(G)$, and the maximal difference between initial opinions is $K$, then the expected convergence time is ${O}\left({n\left(K\log (Kn)+γ(G) n \right)}/{Φ(G)^2}\right)$. This bound is essentially optimal for a large class of graphs of bounded expansion. We also show that for regular graphs, if the second largest eigenvalue is $o(1/\log^2 n)$ and $K$ is $o\left({n}/{\log^2 n}\right)$, then w.h.p.\ DIV converges to the initial average opinion (rounded up or down).

Abdou Majeed Alidou, Júlia Baligács, Max Hahn-Klimroth et al.

Polarization and unexpected correlations between opinions on diverse topics (including in politics, culture and consumer choices) are an object of sustained attention. However, numerous theoretical models do not seem to convincingly explain these phenomena. This paper is motivated by a recent line of work, studying models where polarization can be explained in terms of biased assimilation and geometric interplay between opinions on various topics. The agent opinions are represented as unit vectors on a multidimensional sphere and updated according to geometric rules. In contrast to previous work, we focus on the classical opinion exchange setting, where the agents update their opinions in discrete time steps, with a pair of agents interacting randomly at every step. The opinions are updated according to an update rule belonging to a general class. Our findings are twofold. First, polarization appears to be ubiquitous in the class of models we study, requiring only relatively modest assumptions reflecting biased assimilation. Second, there is a qualitative difference between two-dimensional dynamics on the one hand, and three or more dimensions on the other. Accordingly, we prove almost sure polarization for a large class of update rules in two dimensions. Then, we prove polarization in three and more dimensions in more limited cases and try to shed light on central difficulties that are absent in two dimensions.