2.3RMNov 12, 2019
An Unethical Optimization PrincipleNicholas Beale, Heather Battey, Anthony C. Davison et al.
If an artificial intelligence aims to maximise risk-adjusted return, then under mild conditions it is disproportionately likely to pick an unethical strategy unless the objective function allows sufficiently for this risk. Even if the proportion $η$ of available unethical strategies is small, the probability ${p_U}$ of picking an unethical strategy can become large; indeed unless returns are fat-tailed ${p_U}$ tends to unity as the strategy space becomes large. We define an Unethical Odds Ratio Upsilon ($Υ$) that allows us to calculate ${p_U}$ from $η$, and we derive a simple formula for the limit of $Υ$ as the strategy space becomes large. We give an algorithm for estimating $Υ$ and ${p_U}$ in finite cases and discuss how to deal with infinite strategy spaces. We show how this principle can be used to help detect unethical strategies and to estimate $η$. Finally we sketch some policy implications of this work.
12.2LGFeb 21, 2019
Overcoming Multi-Model ForgettingYassine Benyahia, Kaicheng Yu, Kamil Bennani-Smires et al.
We identify a phenomenon, which we refer to as multi-model forgetting, that occurs when sequentially training multiple deep networks with partially-shared parameters; the performance of previously-trained models degrades as one optimizes a subsequent one, due to the overwriting of shared parameters. To overcome this, we introduce a statistically-justified weight plasticity loss that regularizes the learning of a model's shared parameters according to their importance for the previous models, and demonstrate its effectiveness when training two models sequentially and for neural architecture search. Adding weight plasticity in neural architecture search preserves the best models to the end of the search and yields improved results in both natural language processing and computer vision tasks.
3.5MLSep 25, 2018
Fast Automatic Smoothing for Generalized Additive ModelsYousra El-Bachir, Anthony C. Davison
Multiple generalized additive models (GAMs) are a type of distributional regression wherein parameters of probability distributions depend on predictors through smooth functions, with selection of the degree of smoothness via $L_2$ regularization. Multiple GAMs allow finer statistical inference by incorporating explanatory information in any or all of the parameters of the distribution. Owing to their nonlinearity, flexibility and interpretability, GAMs are widely used, but reliable and fast methods for automatic smoothing in large datasets are still lacking, despite recent advances. We develop a general methodology for automatically learning the optimal degree of $L_2$ regularization for multiple GAMs using an empirical Bayes approach. The smooth functions are penalized by different amounts, which are learned simultaneously by maximization of a marginal likelihood through an approximate expectation-maximization algorithm that involves a double Laplace approximation at the E-step, and leads to an efficient M-step. Empirical analysis shows that the resulting algorithm is numerically stable, faster than all existing methods and achieves state-of-the-art accuracy. For illustration, we apply it to an important and challenging problem in the analysis of extremal data.