Rabi Pathak

Nithin Somasekharan, Rabi Pathak, Manushri Dhanakoti et al.

Recent LLM-based agents have closed substantial portions of the scientific discovery loop in software-only machine-learning research, in chemistry, and in biology. Extending the same loop to high-fidelity physical simulators is harder, because solver completion does not imply physical validity and many failure modes appear only in field-level imagery rather than in solver logs. We present AI CFD Scientist, an open-source AI scientist for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) that, to our knowledge, is the first to span literature-grounded ideation, validated execution, vision-based physics verification, source-code modification, and figure-grounded writing within a single inspectable workflow. Three coupled pathways cover parameter sweeps within a fixed solver, case-local C++ library compilation for new physical models, and open-ended hypothesis search against a reference comparator, all running on OpenFOAM through Foam-Agent. At the center of the framework is a vision-language physics-verification gate that inspects rendered flow fields before any result is accepted, rerun, or written into a manuscript. On five tasks under a shared GPT-5.5 backbone, AI CFD Scientist autonomously discovers a Spalart-Allmaras runtime correction that reduces lower-wall Cf RMSE against DNS by 7.89% on the periodic hill at Reh=5600; under matched LLM cost, two strong general AI-scientist baselines (ARIS, DeepScientist) execute partial CFD workflows but lack the domain-specific validity gates needed to convert runs into defensible scientific claims; and a controlled planted-failure ablation shows that the vision-language gate detects 14 of 16 silent failures missed by solver-level checks. Code, prompts, and run artifacts are released at https://github.com/csml-rpi/cfd-scientist.

Kumbha Nagaswetha, Rabi Pathak

Constant Liar (CL), Kriging Believer (KB), and fantasy models are widely used for batch selection in parallel Bayesian Optimization, yet a unified theory explaining their effectiveness and conditions under which they fail has been lacking. We identify efficient conditioning as the key surrogate property the ability to update predictions in closed form when data is augmented. We prove that Gaussian Processes satisfy this requirement, producing provably distinct batch points with separation of order l, and that this holds for any acquisition function monotonically non decreasing in posterior uncertainty (EI, UCB, PI), with qualitatively similar behavior for Thompson Sampling. We unify CL, KB, and fantasy models as instances of a single conditioning mechanism differing only in the lie value distribution, and draw quantitative connections to Local Penalization (LP) and qualitative connections to Determinantal Point Processes (DPPs). To disentangle model structure from optimizer randomness, we introduce the Structural Diversity Diagnostic (SDD), a reusable methodology for testing surrogate compatibility. Experiments on Hartmann6D, Ackley 8D, Levy10D, and SVM hyperparameter tuning validate all theoretical predictions: CL or KBs implicit penalty matches or outperforms explicit LP greedy conditioning achieves convergence on par with joint qEI efficient conditioning extends to Multiquadric RBF networks; and parametric surrogates produce degenerate batches even when fully retrained (random forests), while neural networks regain diversity only at 15x the wall clock cost of GP conditioning. Robustness is confirmed across multiple initial datasets and under observation noise.