Georg Tennigkeit

Paul Sievers, George Skretas, Georg Tennigkeit

Network redesign problems ask for modifications to the edges of a given graph to satisfy certain properties. In temporal graphs, where edges are only active at certain times, we are sometimes only allowed to modify when the edges are going to be active. In practice, we might not even be able to perform all of the necessary modifications at once; changes must be applied step-by-step while the network is still in operation, meaning that the network must continue to satisfy some properties. To initiate a study in this area, we introduce the class of temporal graph reconfiguration problems. As a starting point, we consider the Layered Connectivity Reconfiguration (LCR) problem: Given two always-connected temporal graphs G1 and G2, determine if it is possible to transform G1 into G2 by changing the time at which a single temporal edge is active in each step, such that every intermediate temporal graph is always-connected. We provide a dynamic programming algorithm for the LCR problem. We also show that finding the shortest reconfiguration sequence between two temporal graphs is APX-hard. Additionally, we show that the LCR problem is equivalent to the Spanning Tree Sequence Reconfiguration (STSR) problem introduced by Hanaka et al. Therefore, our results also answer the two open questions presented by the authors: (i) find a simpler algorithm for the STSR problem, (ii) show that the STSR problem is inapproximable up to some factor.

Argyrios Deligkas, Michelle Döring, Eduard Eiben et al.

We examine the problem of maximizing the reachability of a given source in temporal graphs that are given as the union of k temporal paths, i.e., every given path is a sequence of edges with strictly increasing labels that denote availability in time. This type of temporal graphs represent train networks. We consider shifting operations on the labels of the paths that maintain their temporal continuity. This means that we can move the availability of a temporal edge later or earlier in time, and propagate the shifts to all other affected edges of the path in order to preserve its temporal connectivity. We study the parameterized complexity of the problem with respect to the number of paths k, and the total budget b, where b is the maximum number of shifts we are allowed to perform. Our results reveal that fixed parameter tractability can be achieved (1) when parameterized both by k and b, and (2) when parameterized by k, and b is unconstrained. In almost every other case, e.g., parameterized by a single parameter or parameterized by k, while having a bound on b, we establish intractability lower bounds that are matched by XP algorithms.