Swati Chandna

Gowrika Mahesh, Budanur Madappa Darshan Gowda, Kavana Gopladevarahalli Papegowda et al.

Editors and reviewers are expected to ensure that manuscripts cite relevant, accurate, current, and ethically appropriate literature, yet manuscript-level citation auditing remains largely manual, fragmented, and difficult to scale. Citation context, metadata quality, self-citation patterns, and bibliographic integrity all affect whether a reference appropriately supports a local claim. We present CitePrism, a transparent hybrid decision-support framework for editorial citation auditing that combines LLM-assisted contextual reasoning, embedding-based semantic similarity, metadata verification, integrity-oriented flags, and human-in-the-loop analyst review. CitePrism extracts citation neighborhoods, enriches reference metadata, computes fused relevance scores, surfaces metadata and self-citation review prompts, and supports configurable threshold-based triage. In a preliminary validation on a single case-study manuscript with 104 references from pavement engineering, agreement with human binary relevance labels reached Cohen's kappa = 0.429. At operating threshold tau = 17, CitePrism flagged all human-labeled irrelevant citations, while also producing false positives requiring analyst review. These results suggest that CitePrism may support conservative editorial screening and citation-quality triage, but they do not establish general editorial performance. CitePrism is intended as pilot-stage decision support, not as an autonomous misconduct detector or automated editorial decision system. Broader validation across manuscripts, domains, annotators, baselines, and deployment settings is required before operational use.

Mehrdad Jalali, Binh Vu, Swati Chandna et al.

Empirical networked systems are often only partially observed: sampling frames, crawling policies, privacy constraints, and temporal gaps can leave actors and edges unobserved. This complicates robustness and sensitivity analysis because many graph-learning pipelines implicitly treat the observed node set as exhaustive. Link prediction and graph completion repair structure among known vertices, whereas full-graph generators synthesize new graphs rather than extending an observed one as a fixed backbone. We study the complementary task of controlled node insertion: generating plausible new actors and attaching them to an existing graph while preserving interpretable global topology. We introduce the Astro Generative Network (AGN), a variational graph autoencoder that samples latent vectors to decode node features and then integrates new vertices through similarity-based attachment to the observed backbone. We distinguish the recommended configuration, AGN, from AGN-original, a diagnostic baseline that permits generated-generated edges. Across three synthetic regimes, AGN-original forms dense generated-generated subgraphs that artificially inflate clustering and density. Disabling those edges removes this artifact while preserving degree and path-length behavior. In our experiments, AGN keeps clustering and modularity changes modest relative to pre-insertion values, while novelty diagnostics show non-trivial separation from existing nodes without claiming domain-grounded identities. Our contribution is methodological: a reproducible insertion protocol and evaluation lens for incomplete network science and engineering