Daniel Dyrda

Julian Geheeb, Farhan Abid Ivan, Daniel Dyrda et al.

Recent research has demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can support experts across various domains, including game design. In this study, we examine the utility of medium-sized LLMs, models that operate on consumer-grade hardware typically available in small studios or home environments. We began by identifying ten key aspects that contribute to a strong game concept and used ChatGPT to generate thirty sample game ideas. Three medium-sized LLMs, LLaMA 3.1, Qwen 2.5, and DeepSeek-R1, were then prompted to evaluate these ideas according to the previously identified aspects. A qualitative assessment by two researchers compared the models' outputs, revealing that DeepSeek-R1 produced the most consistently useful feedback, despite some variability in quality. To explore real-world applicability, we ran a pilot study with ten students enrolled in a storytelling course for game development. At the early stages of their own projects, students used our prompt and DeepSeek-R1 to refine their game concepts. The results indicate a positive reception: most participants rated the output as high quality and expressed interest in using such tools in their workflows. These findings suggest that current medium-sized LLMs can provide valuable feedback in early game design, though further refinement of prompting methods could improve consistency and overall effectiveness.

Julian Geheeb, Marvin Julian Schwarz, Daniel Dyrda et al.

Game Design Pillars are natural language artifacts commonly used in game development to communicate a project's core vision and ensure a coherent player experience. Their linguistic nature aligns well with the strengths of Large Language Models (LLMs), which excel at generating and interpreting natural language, making them strong candidates for supporting mixed-initiative workflows centered on design pillars. In this study, we introduce a formal definition of game design pillars, present an initial prototype -- SPINE -- and investigate the utility of LLMs in the creation and decision-making processes associated with pillar-driven workflows. We begin with a pre-study to identify an appropriate model, comparing \texttt{gemini-2.0-flash} and \texttt{GPT-4o-mini}. Results show that Gemini is better suited to our tasks due to its greater output variety and consistency. We then conduct a case study by deploying the tool at a local game jam. Findings indicate positive reception and clear value in integrating SPINE into early-stage development. Finally, we interview four experts, demonstrating the tool and allowing them to experiment with it in a controlled environment. While individual perspectives vary, the overall perception is encouraging and supports our intuition: LLMs can meaningfully contribute to game design pillar workflows. These early findings highlight the potential of formalizing pillar-driven design as a research space and point toward several promising avenues for future work.