82.8CCMay 19
On Approximability of Satisfiable k-CSPs: VAmey Bhangale, Subhash Khot, Dor Minzer
We propose a framework of algorithm vs. hardness for all Max-CSPs and demonstrate it for a large class of predicates. This framework extends the work of Raghavendra [STOC, 2008], who showed a similar result for almost satisfiable Max-CSPs. Our framework is based on a new hybrid approximation algorithm, which uses a combination of the Gaussian elimination technique (i.e., solving a system of linear equations over an Abelian group) and the semidefinite programming relaxation. We complement our algorithm with a matching dictator vs. quasirandom test that has perfect completeness. The analysis of our dictator vs. quasirandom test is based on a novel invariance principle, which we call the mixed invariance principle. Our mixed invariance principle is an extension of the invariance principle of Mossel, O'Donnell and Oleszkiewicz [Annals of Mathematics, 2010] which plays a crucial role in Raghavendra's work. The mixed invariance principle allows one to relate 3-wise correlations over discrete probability spaces with expectations over spaces that are a mixture of Guassian spaces and Abelian groups, and may be of independent interest.
40.9CCMay 11
Optimal Inapproximability of Generalized Linear Equations over a Finite GroupAmey Bhangale, Yezhou Zhang
Constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) consist of a set of variables taking values from some finite domain and a set of local constraints on these variables. The objective is to find an assignment to the variables that maximizes the fraction of satisfied constraints. In this work, we study the CSP where the constraints are generalized linear equations over a finite group G. More specifically, for a given $S \subseteq G$, the constraints in this CSP are of the form addition of the values to the variables (similarly, product for non-abelian groups), belonging to the set $S$. We give an approximation algorithm for this problem on satisfiable instances and show that it is optimal for certain $S$ assuming $P\neq NP$. This natural predicate is one of the very few known predicates that are approximation resistant on almost satisfiable instances, assuming $P\neq NP$, but admits a non-trivial approximation algorithm on satisfiable instances.
10.1DSMay 11
A 4.509-Approximation Algorithm for Generalized Min Sum Set CoverAmey Bhangale, Yezhou Zhang
We study the \emph{generalized min-sum set cover} (GMSSC) problem, where given a collection of hyperedges $E$ with arbitrary covering requirements $\{k_e \in \mathbb{Z}^+ : e \in E\}$, the objective is to find an ordering of the vertices that minimizes the total cover time of the hyperedges. A hyperedge $e$ is considered covered at the first time when $k_e$ of its vertices appear in the ordering. We present a $4.509$-approximation algorithm for GMSSC, improving upon the previous best-known guarantee of $4.642$~\cite[SODA'21]{BansalBFT21}. Our approach retains the general LP-based framework of Bansal, Batra, Farhadi, and Tetali~\cite{BansalBFT21} but provides an improved analysis that narrows the gap toward the lower bound of $4$-approximation assuming P$\neq$NP. Our analysis takes advantage of the constraints of the linear program in a nontrivial way, along with new lower-tail bounds for the sums of independent Bernoulli random variables, which could be of independent interest.