Hoyt Koepke

ML
h-index5
4papers
250citations
Novelty51%
AI Score25

4 Papers

35.9OCJun 1, 2015
Coordinate Descent Converges Faster with the Gauss-Southwell Rule Than Random Selection

Julie Nutini, Mark Schmidt, Issam H. Laradji et al.

There has been significant recent work on the theory and application of randomized coordinate descent algorithms, beginning with the work of Nesterov [SIAM J. Optim., 22(2), 2012], who showed that a random-coordinate selection rule achieves the same convergence rate as the Gauss-Southwell selection rule. This result suggests that we should never use the Gauss-Southwell rule, as it is typically much more expensive than random selection. However, the empirical behaviours of these algorithms contradict this theoretical result: in applications where the computational costs of the selection rules are comparable, the Gauss-Southwell selection rule tends to perform substantially better than random coordinate selection. We give a simple analysis of the Gauss-Southwell rule showing that---except in extreme cases---its convergence rate is faster than choosing random coordinates. Further, in this work we (i) show that exact coordinate optimization improves the convergence rate for certain sparse problems, (ii) propose a Gauss-Southwell-Lipschitz rule that gives an even faster convergence rate given knowledge of the Lipschitz constants of the partial derivatives, (iii) analyze the effect of approximate Gauss-Southwell rules, and (iv) analyze proximal-gradient variants of the Gauss-Southwell rule.

2.8MLMar 4, 2015
A General Hybrid Clustering Technique

Saeid Amiri, Bertrand Clarke, Jennifer Clarke et al.

Here, we propose a clustering technique for general clustering problems including those that have non-convex clusters. For a given desired number of clusters $K$, we use three stages to find a clustering. The first stage uses a hybrid clustering technique to produce a series of clusterings of various sizes (randomly selected). They key steps are to find a $K$-means clustering using $K_\ell$ clusters where $K_\ell \gg K$ and then joins these small clusters by using single linkage clustering. The second stage stabilizes the result of stage one by reclustering via the `membership matrix' under Hamming distance to generate a dendrogram. The third stage is to cut the dendrogram to get $K^*$ clusters where $K^* \geq K$ and then prune back to $K$ to give a final clustering. A variant on our technique also gives a reasonable estimate for $K_T$, the true number of clusters. We provide a series of arguments to justify the steps in the stages of our methods and we provide numerous examples involving real and simulated data to compare our technique with other related techniques.

1.4MLDec 6, 2013
An Algorithmic Theory of Dependent Regularizers, Part 1: Submodular Structure

Hoyt Koepke, Marina Meila

We present an exploration of the rich theoretical connections between several classes of regularized models, network flows, and recent results in submodular function theory. This work unifies key aspects of these problems under a common theory, leading to novel methods for working with several important models of interest in statistics, machine learning and computer vision. In Part 1, we review the concepts of network flows and submodular function optimization theory foundational to our results. We then examine the connections between network flows and the minimum-norm algorithm from submodular optimization, extending and improving several current results. This leads to a concise representation of the structure of a large class of pairwise regularized models important in machine learning, statistics and computer vision. In Part 2, we describe the full regularization path of a class of penalized regression problems with dependent variables that includes the graph-guided LASSO and total variation constrained models. This description also motivates a practical algorithm. This allows us to efficiently find the regularization path of the discretized version of TV penalized models. Ultimately, our new algorithms scale up to high-dimensional problems with millions of variables.

2.7LGJun 18, 2012
Fast Prediction of New Feature Utility

Hoyt Koepke, Mikhail Bilenko

We study the new feature utility prediction problem: statistically testing whether adding a new feature to the data representation can improve predictive accuracy on a supervised learning task. In many applications, identifying new informative features is the primary pathway for improving performance. However, evaluating every potential feature by re-training the predictor with it can be costly. The paper describes an efficient, learner-independent technique for estimating new feature utility without re-training based on the current predictor's outputs. The method is obtained by deriving a connection between loss reduction potential and the new feature's correlation with the loss gradient of the current predictor. This leads to a simple yet powerful hypothesis testing procedure, for which we prove consistency. Our theoretical analysis is accompanied by empirical evaluation on standard benchmarks and a large-scale industrial dataset.