Jordan F. McCann

Jordan F. McCann

Independently trained transformers compute the same function in residual-stream bases that differ by a uniform random rotation on $\mathrm{SO}(d_{\mathrm{model}})$. We call this phenomenon polymorphism: same function, mutually unintelligible interior coordinates. One matrix multiplication per model pair removes it: an orthogonal Procrustes fit on a single batch of activations transfers sparse-autoencoder feature dictionaries and steering vectors between independently trained models, with no retraining. The phenomenon is invisible to the standard SAE universality metric. Decoder-column cosine similarity matches across seeds at 98%, the SAE-universality headline number, while an SAE trained on one seed reconstructs another seed's activations at negative explained variance, worse than predicting the constant mean. The decoder columns align; the encoder reads from a rotated frame. A single Procrustes rotation $R$ restores reconstruction to within 0.025 EV of the within-seed ceiling at every internal site. $R$ is Haar-distributed: $\|R - I\|_F$ matches the random-orthogonal prediction $\sqrt{2 d_{\mathrm{model}}}$ to 0.1% at $d_{\mathrm{model}} = 512$, and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of $R$'s eigenvalue spectrum against Haar $\mathrm{SO}(d_{\mathrm{model}})$ returns $p \approx 1.000$ pooled and per-pair. Diff-of-means steering vectors transfer in three regimes by alignment with $R$'s invariant subspace: clean when pinned by shared output weights, partial when overlapping the rotated subspace, inverted otherwise. With no shared I/O (Pythia), all three collapse to universally inverted. The same rotation account holds across training checkpoints within a single run. Validated on a 104k-parameter Dyck-3 transformer and nine independently-trained Pythia-70m seeds on The Pile, via a pre-registered four-bar operational framework. Frontier-scale (10B+) replication remains open.

Jordan F. McCann

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are now standard tools for decomposing language model activations into interpretable features, and automated interpretability pipelines routinely assign each feature a short natural-language explanation. Existing critiques of this practice focus on polysemanticity -- one feature with many meanings -- or on whether explanations predict activations. We identify a complementary, structurally distinct problem we call descriptive collision: many distinct SAE features admit the same explanation. Reanalyzing the largest publicly-available dataset of human-annotated SAE features (Marks et al., 2025), comprising 722 annotated features across Gemma 2 2B and Pythia 70M, we find that the mean annotation string is reused across 3.07 features; 82.1% of features share their annotation with at least one other feature; and the single most common annotation string ("plural nouns") labels 101 distinct features spanning 18 layers and four model components. Information-theoretically, the average annotation resolves only 70% of feature identity. We formalize a property called discrimination, prove that current detection-style auto-interpretability scoring is invariant to collision, and propose two complementary corrective metrics -- collision-adjusted detection and discrimination scoring -- that explicitly penalize explanations that fail to distinguish a feature from its neighbors. The collision problem is independent of, and additive with, previously identified failure modes of auto-interpretability; ignoring it inflates reported feature interpretability by a quantity equal to roughly one-third of the bits required to identify a feature.