Guangyuan Dong

Guangyuan Dong, Ziwei Hong, Shenghao Liu et al.

Although Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) effectively leverages rich information from language, visual, and acoustic modalities, existing methods still face two core challenges: 1) static conflict suppression mechanisms fail to adapt to dynamic variations across samples, and 2) the inherent sentimental bias within the language modality, which can misguide learning from other modalities, remains entangled. To this end, we propose a Dynamic Multimodal Causal Disentanglement and Adaptive Fusion Framework (MCAF). Its cornerstone is the Multi-Granularity Causal Dynamic Router and a Conditional Diffusion Denoising Module. First, we introduce a causal intervention module based on the information bottleneck principle, which builds a Structural Causal Model to disentangle sentimental bias from language features, yielding a "de-confounded" language representation as a pure guiding signal. Second, we devise a Dynamic Multimodal Router that evaluates the interaction states (complementary, conflicting, or redundant) among visual, acoustic, and de-confounded language signals in real-time across three levels: feature, temporal, and modality, then adaptively allocates weights and routes information flow for fine-grained regulation. Finally, a lightweight Conditional Diffusion Denoising Module performs iterative denoising on the fused joint representation to explicitly filter out residual irrelevant information, generating a robust hyper-modality representation. Extensive experiments on the CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI benchmarks show that MCAF sets new state-of-the-art on key classification metrics, achieving an Acc-2/F1 of 86.52%/86.51% on MOSI and 86.72%/86.65% on MOSEI, while remaining highly competitive on others. Comprehensive analyses and visualizations further validate its efficacy in dynamically perceiving interactions, disentangling bias, and enhancing interpretability.

Haobo Zhang, Xutao Mao, Guangyuan Dong et al.

Memory-backed agents need provenance that can survive leaked or migrated snapshots, where logs, visible outputs, and trusted metadata may be absent. We propose MemMark, a state-evolution attribution watermark that embeds an owner-controlled signal into latent memory-write decisions. At each internal LLM call, MemMark samples among admissible candidates using keyed, distribution-preserving selection, and records cryptographic commitments with signed session anchors and reveal evidence. This makes attribution depend on reproducible backend behavior rather than mutable provenance fields. Across A-Mem and Graphiti on LoCoMo, with three LLM backbones, MemMark preserves memory utility: Overall F1 retains 99.6% of the unwatermarked baseline, while BLEU-1 changes by +0.2%. It also provides usable carrier capacity, with 1.16, 1.14, and 1.26 bits of mean entropy for update-target, link-target, and semantic-realization decisions. In the snapshot-only R3 setting, MemMark recovers the full 40-bit payload from final snapshots, while wrong-key verification remains near chance. Under nine memory-lifecycle attacks, verification distinguishes tampering, evidence deletion, and partial payload recovery. These results show that robust snapshot-only attribution is feasible for long-term agent memory without surviving traces, trusted metadata, or utility-degrading.

Jiaxin Liu, Ding Zhong, Yue Wang et al.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in bridging visual perception and natural language understanding, enabling a wide range of multimodal reasoning tasks. However, they often produce object hallucinations, describing content absent from the input image, which limits their reliability and interpretability. To address this limitation, we propose Dual-Pathway Circuit Analysis, a framework that identifies and characterizes hallucination-related circuits in VLMs for mechanistic understanding and causal probing. We first apply activation patching across five architecturally diverse VLMs to identify a visual grounding pathway that supports correct predictions and a hallucination pathway that drives erroneous outputs. We then introduce Conditional Pathway Analysis (CPA) to characterize pathway-level interactions, revealing that grounding components remain strongly redundant in both correct and hallucinating samples but undergo a consistent polarity flip, shifting from supporting the ground truth on correct samples to aligning with the hallucinated answer on erroneous ones. We further perform targeted suppression of hallucination-pathway components, showing that scaling these components reduces object hallucination by up to 76% with minimal accuracy cost, and validate that the same circuit selectively transfers to relational but not attribute hallucination. Evaluations on POPE-adversarial and AMBER show that the identified circuits are consistent across architectures, support causal intervention, and transfer selectively across hallucination types.