3.3NIAug 14, 2023
Routing Recovery for UAV Networks with Deliberate Attacks: A Reinforcement Learning based ApproachSijie He, Ziye Jia, Chao Dong et al.
The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) network is popular these years due to its various applications. In the UAV network, routing is significantly affected by the distributed network topology, leading to the issue that UAVs are vulnerable to deliberate damage. Hence, this paper focuses on the routing plan and recovery for UAV networks with attacks. In detail, a deliberate attack model based on the importance of nodes is designed to represent enemy attacks. Then, a node importance ranking mechanism is presented, considering the degree of nodes and link importance. However, it is intractable to handle the routing problem by traditional methods for UAV networks, since link connections change with the UAV availability. Hence, an intelligent algorithm based on reinforcement learning is proposed to recover the routing path when UAVs are attacked. Simulations are conducted and numerical results verify the proposed mechanism performs better than other referred methods.
4.3NIFeb 13, 2023
Computation Offloading for Uncertain Marine Tasks by Cooperation of UAVs and VesselsJiahao You, Ziye Jia, Chao Dong et al.
With the continuous increment of maritime applications, the development of marine networks for data offloading becomes necessary. However, the limited maritime network resources are very difficult to satisfy real-time demands. Besides, how to effectively handle multiple compute-intensive tasks becomes another intractable issue. Hence, in this paper, we focus on the decision of maritime task offloading by the cooperation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and vessels. Specifically, we first propose a cooperative offloading framework, including the demands from marine Internet of Things (MIoTs) devices and resource providers from UAVs and vessels. Due to the limited energy and computation ability of UAVs, it is necessary to help better apply the vessels to computation offloading. Then, we formulate the studied problem into a Markov decision process, aiming to minimize the total execution time and energy cost. Then, we leverage Lyapunov optimization to convert the long-term constraints of the total execution time and energy cost into their short-term constraints, further yielding a set of per-time-slot optimization problems. Furthermore, we propose a Q-learning based approach to solve the short-term problem efficiently. Finally, simulation results are conducted to verify the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
30.3AIJun 17
Externalizing Research Synthesis and Validation in AI Scientists through a Research HarnessZijian Wang, Hanqi Li, Ziyue Yang et al.
AI systems can increasingly automate scientific workflows, but the reasoning that links prior evidence, generated ideas, experiments and final claims often remains implicit inside model inference. Here we introduce Xcientist, a research harness that externalizes research synthesis and experimental validation into inspectable, contract-governed processes. Xcientist organizes literature evidence, idea states, implementation plans, ablation records and repair traces as persistent research artifacts, so that generated mechanisms can be grounded, executed, tested and revised without losing their evidential basis. We identify claim drift as a failure mode of automated research, where runnable artifacts no longer support the mechanism originally claimed. Across training-free memory systems, graph-structured traffic forecasting and multi-scale physics-informed neural networks, Xcientist preserves traceable trajectories from problem formulation to mechanism design, validation and bounded revision. These results suggest that AI scientists should be evaluated not only by their final artifacts, but by whether their synthesis and validation processes remain attributable, inspectable and scientifically accountable.