John Goertz

Ruby Sedgwick, John P. Goertz, Molly M. Stevens et al.

With the rise in engineered biomolecular devices, there is an increased need for tailor-made biological sequences. Often, many similar biological sequences need to be made for a specific application meaning numerous, sometimes prohibitively expensive, lab experiments are necessary for their optimization. This paper presents a transfer learning design of experiments workflow to make this development feasible. By combining a transfer learning surrogate model with Bayesian optimization, we show how the total number of experiments can be reduced by sharing information between optimization tasks. We demonstrate the reduction in the number of experiments using data from the development of DNA competitors for use in an amplification-based diagnostic assay. We use cross-validation to compare the predictive accuracy of different transfer learning models, and then compare the performance of the models for both single objective and penalized optimization tasks.

Ruby Sedgwick, John Goertz, Molly Stevens et al.

There is a growing trend in molecular and synthetic biology of using mechanistic (non machine learning) models to design biomolecular networks. Once designed, these networks need to be validated by experimental results to ensure the theoretical network correctly models the true system. However, these experiments can be expensive and time consuming. We propose a design of experiments approach for validating these networks efficiently. Gaussian processes are used to construct a probabilistic model of the discrepancy between experimental results and the designed response, then a Bayesian optimization strategy used to select the next sample points. We compare different design criteria and develop a stopping criterion based on a metric that quantifies this discrepancy over the whole surface, and its uncertainty. We test our strategy on simulated data from computer models of biochemical processes.