4 Papers

46.7NTMay 20
A Local Valuation Criterion for Quadratic-Permutation Interleaved Zadoff--Chu Sequences

Yutong Zhang, Yaoran Yang

Berggren and Popović introduced quadratic-permutation-polynomial interleaved Zadoff--Chu sequences and, from exhaustive data, conjectured that all normalized QPP-interleaved Zadoff--Chu sequences are inequivalent to ordinary Zadoff--Chu sequences precisely for prime-power lengths $N=p^n$ with $p>3$ and $n>1$. We give an exact local arithmetic criterion. For a normalized QPP $π_{a,b}(k)=ak^2+bk\pmod N$, the interleaved sequence is equivalent, under the standard five CAZAC-preserving operations, to a Zadoff--Chu sequence if and only if, for every prime power $p^α\Vert N$, the valuation of $a$ satisfies \[ ν_p(a)\ge \begin{cases} 0, & p=2,\ α=1,\\ α-1, & p=2,\ α\ge2,\\ α-1, & p=3,\\ α, & p>3. \end{cases} \] The proof is based on a third finite-difference invariant of the lifted Zadoff--Chu phase, namely \[ Δ^3\bigl((ak^2+bk+\varepsilon_N+2q)(ak^2+bk)\bigr) =12a(2ak+3a+b). \] As a consequence, the conjectured prime-power boundary is not correct: the exact non-vacuous condition for all nonzero normalized QPPs to be inequivalent to Zadoff--Chu sequences is that $N$ is odd, $9\nmid N$, and $p^2\mid N$ for at least one prime $p\ge5$. In particular, $N=75=3\cdot5^2$ is the smallest non-prime-power counterexample to the conjectured ``only if'' direction. A second corollary records the corresponding statement for irreducible QPPs.

48.3ITMay 17
Algebraic Resolutions of Seven Open Problems on Cyclic and Negacyclic Codes Supporting Designs

Yutong Zhang, Yaoran Yang

This paper gives a unified algebraic solution to seven open problems of Wang, Tang and Ding on cyclic, negacyclic and constacyclic codes supporting designs. For the cyclic code \[ C\left(\frac{p^s-1}{2},\frac{p^s+1}{2}\right), \] a Cayley parametrization of the unit circle reduces the trace-zero condition to a semilinear equation on \(\PG(1,q)\). Its large root sets are exactly the \(\F_{p^{\gcd(m,s)}}\)-sublines, yielding the complementary design \[ \overline{S(3,q_0+1,q+1)}. \] For the length \(q^2+1\) negacyclic code, a quotient transport from \(\U_{2(q^2+1)}\) to \(\U_{q^2+1}\) and a unit-circle parametrization show that the minimum zero sets are precisely the Baer sublines of \(\PG(1,q^2)\). Equivalently, the corresponding support design is the complement of the non-tangent plane sections of an elliptic quadric \(\Q^-(3,q)\). For constacyclic ovoid codes of length \(q^2+1\) over \(\F_q\), the exact existence criterion is \[ λ\in\F_q^*,\qquad \exists\ λ\text{-constacyclic ovoid code} \Longleftrightarrow λ\notin(\F_q^*)^2. \] In particular, negacyclic ovoid codes exist exactly when \(q\equiv3\pmod4\). The proof uses the corrected projective-order congruence \[ a=(q+1)c,\qquad c\equiv b\pmod{q-1},\qquad \operatorname{ord}(θ\F_q^*)=\frac{q^2+1}{\gcd(q^2+1,c)}. \] The paper also derives a universal weight enumerator for lifted ovoid codes over extension fields, independent of the chosen ovoid. Finally, consecutive-root negacyclic MDS codes are constructed to give complete simple \(5\)-designs, including a proper negacyclic \([11,5,7]_{23}\) code whose minimum supports form the complete \(5-(11,7,15)\) design.

48.2DSMay 17
One-Shot Klein Cutting Planes for Lipschitz Geodesically Convex Optimization in Hyperbolic Space

Yutong Zhang, Yaoran Yang, Yifan Zhu et al.

We solve the negative constant-curvature case of the COLT 2023 open problem of Criscitiello, Martínez-Rubio, and Boumal on deterministic first-order methods for Lipschitz geodesically convex optimization. Let \[ \HH^d_{-\kappaC^2}=\{X\in\R^{d+1}:\ipL{X}{X}=-1,\ X_0>0\}, \qquad \ip{U}{V}_{X}=\kappaC^{-2}\ipL{U}{V}, \] so the sectional curvature is $-\kappaC^2$. If \[ f:\bar B_{\HH}(x_0,r)\to\R \] is geodesically convex and $M$-Lipschitz, and $s=\kappaC r$, our one-shot Klein cutting-plane method returns a queried point $\hat x$ with \[ f(\hat x)-\min_{\bar B_{\HH}(x_0,r)}f\le \eps Mr \] using at most \[ \left\lceil 2d(d+1) \log\!\left(\frac{16\sinh s\cosh s}{s\eps}\right)\right\rceil \] oracle calls. For $d\ge2$ each localization update costs $O(d^2)$ arithmetic operations; for $d=1$ an interval variant satisfies the same bound. Consequently \[ N=O\bigl(d^2(s+\log(e/\eps))\bigr) =O\bigl(d^2ζ_s\log(e/\eps)\bigr), \qquad ζ_s=s/\tanh s . \] The argument is not a convex coordinate pullback: in the Beltrami--Klein chart the objective is generally only quasiconvex. The key point is that every Riemannian subgradient halfspace becomes an exact Euclidean central cut. For \[ θ=\kappaC\dist(X,Y), \] \[ \ip{g}{\log_XY}_{X} =\fracθ{\kappaC^2\sinhθ}\ipL{g}{Y}, \] and tangency at $X$ turns $\ipL{g}{Y}\le0$ into \[ \gbar^{\mathsf T}(u-c)\le0, \qquad u=Φ(Y),\quad c=Φ(X). \] Thus a fixed Euclidean ellipsoid localizes the whole hyperbolic ball. The only curvature payment is the Klein distortion factor \[ \log\left(\frac{\sinh s\cosh s}{s\eps}\right) =\log(1/\eps)+2s-\log(4s)+O(e^{-4s}). \]

45.9ITMay 16
Intermediate Constacyclic Codes and Scalar-Residue Reed--Muller Layers

Yaoran Yang, Yutong Zhang

A 2024 paper of Sun, Ding and Wang introduced a second class of constacyclic codes over finite fields, denoted $C(q,m,r,\ell)$, with length $(q^m-1)/r$, where $r\mid(q-1)$ and the defining monomials have total $q$-ary degree congruent to $r-1$ modulo $r$. In the non-projective intermediate range $2<r<q-1$ the paper gave a sharp-looking upper bound and a BCH-type lower bound, and left the minimum distance open. We prove that the upper bound is the exact minimum distance for every admissible intermediate parameter. More precisely, if $\ell=(q-1)a+b<(q-1)m-1$, $0\le b\le q-2$, and $b\equiv r-1\pmod r$, then, for every prime power $q$, every divisor $r$ of $q-1$ with $2<r<q-1$, and every $m\ge2$, \[ d(C(q,m,r,\ell))= \begin{cases} \displaystyle \frac{q-1}{r}(q-b+1)q^{m-a-2},&0\le a\le m-2,\\[1mm] \displaystyle \frac{q-b+r-2}{r},&a=m-1. \end{cases} \] The first line settles the open problem of Sun, Ding and Wang; the second line is the terminal case already forced by their BCH bound. We also determine the minimum affine support of every non-terminal scalar-residue layer of a generalized Reed--Muller code. The resulting dichotomy says that the first Reed--Muller weight survives exactly for residue classes $0$ and $1$, while every other residue-matched layer starts at the second Reed--Muller weight. The proof uses the hidden scalar homogeneity of the evaluation model, an orbit-counting obstruction for minimum Reed--Muller supports, and a homogeneous pencil construction that attains the second weight.