Lauren Watson

Lauren Watson, Eric Gan, Mohan Dantam et al.

Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) is known to have poorer training and test performance on large neural networks, compared to ordinary stochastic gradient descent (SGD). In this paper, we perform a detailed study and comparison of the two processes and unveil several new insights. By comparing the behavior of the two processes separately in early and late epochs, we find that while DP-SGD makes slower progress in early stages, it is the behavior in the later stages that determines the end result. This separate analysis of the clipping and noise addition steps of DP-SGD shows that while noise introduces errors to the process, gradient descent can recover from these errors when it is not clipped, and clipping appears to have a larger impact than noise. These effects are amplified in higher dimensions (large neural networks), where the loss basin occupies a lower dimensional space. We argue theoretically and using extensive experiments that magnitude pruning can be a suitable dimension reduction technique in this regard, and find that heavy pruning can improve the test accuracy of DPSGD.

Lauren Watson, Benedek Rozemberczki, Rik Sarkar

Private machine learning involves addition of noise while training, resulting in lower accuracy. Intuitively, greater stability can imply greater privacy and improve this privacy-utility tradeoff. We study this role of stability in private empirical risk minimization, where differential privacy is achieved by output perturbation, and establish a corresponding theoretical result showing that for strongly-convex loss functions, an algorithm with uniform stability of $β$ implies a bound of $O(\sqrtβ)$ on the scale of noise required for differential privacy. The result applies to both explicit regularization and to implicitly stabilized ERM, such as adaptations of Stochastic Gradient Descent that are known to be stable. Thus, it generalizes recent results that improve privacy through modifications to SGD, and establishes stability as the unifying perspective. It implies new privacy guarantees for optimizations with uniform stability guarantees, where a corresponding differential privacy guarantee was previously not known. Experimental results validate the utility of stability enhanced privacy in several problems, including application of elastic nets and feature selection.