Raja Khurram Shahzad

Raja Khurram Shahzad, Muhammad Mustaqeem, Haroon Elahi

The number of malware (either variant or novel) is rapidly increasing, making malware detection and mitigation a complex problem. One approach to improving malware mitigation is automatic detection and malware family classification. However, traditional malware detection methods cannot classify detected malware into their respective families, hindering effective malware mitigation. Consequently, this paper proposes a method to automate malware detection and classification of the detected malware into respective malware families. The proposed method uses feature fusion after extracting relevant malware features such as API calls and fixed and variable length n-grams with a customized feature selection method. Moreover, for the predictive model, a voting based approach is proposed for algorithm fusion. For the experimental evaluation of the proposed method, both binary and multi-class classification approaches are applied to the data set provided by Microsoft. Finally, the experimental results are compared with the state of the art. The experimental results indicate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach with an AUC of 0.989, accuracy of 99.72%, and a log loss of 0.01.

Husnain Amjad, Raja Khurram Shahzad, Aamir Shahzad et al.

Mathematical reasoning is essential for problem-solving in education, science, and industry, serving as a crucial benchmark for evaluating artificial intelligence systems. As Large Language Models (LLMs) improve their reasoning capabilities, understanding how well they perform mathematical reasoning has become increasingly important. This survey synthesizes recent advancements in mathematical reasoning with LLMs through a structured analysis of datasets, architectures, training strategies, and evaluation protocols. Our systematic review encompasses approximately 120 peer-reviewed studies and preprints, examining the evolution of this research area and providing a unified analytical framework to understand current progress and limitations. Our study particularly introduces a unified taxonomy of mathematical datasets, distinguishing between pretraining corpora, supervised fine-tuning resources, and evaluation benchmarks across varying levels of reasoning complexity. A systematic analysis of reasoning architectures and training strategies, including tool integration, verifier-guided reasoning, and parameter-efficient adaptation, is presented to assess their effects on reasoning robustness and generalization. Moreover, a comparative evaluation of existing metrics highlights the gap between final-answer accuracy and process-level reasoning verification. By synthesizing insights across these areas, our analysis identifies recurring failure modes, such as reasoning faithfulness issues, benchmark biases, and generalization limitations, and outlines key research directions toward improving symbolic grounding, evaluation reliability, and the development of more robust and trustworthy LLM-based reasoning systems.