Karl A. Kalina

Dominik K. Klein, Rogelio Ortigosa, Heinrich T. Roth et al.

Polyconvex constitutive modeling is attractive as it guarantees stability of numerical simulations and can improve the generalization behavior of material models. However, in certain applications, polyconvex formulations perform poorly in reproducing the underlying ground truth material response, which can effectively preclude their practical use. In this work, we address this issue and investigate the limitations of polyconvex constitutive modeling. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) We analyze the theoretical reasons why polyconvexity may, in some cases, impose overly restrictive constraints that limit the achievable accuracy of constitutive models. Thereby, we provide analytical ellipticity guarantees for two non-polyconvex Mooney-Rivlin type potentials. (2) We investigate the practical limitations of polyconvex physics-augmented neural network constitutive models using two representative formulations: models using structural tensor-based invariants and models using signed singular values. Their performance is evaluated on datasets obtained from homogenized microstructured materials, and their predictive capabilities are assessed in finite element simulations. (3) Overall, we provide an overview of benefits, limitations, and mitigation strategies of polyconvex constitutive modeling.

Dominik K. Klein, Karl A. Kalina, Rogelio Ortigosa et al.

A key challenge in material theory is the formulation of models that satisfy all common mechanical constitutive conditions while retaining sufficient flexibility. In this context, several important modeling aspects remain unresolved for polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity. We address some of these challenges and apply our results for physics-augmented neural network (PANN) constitutive modeling. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) We propose a new polyconvex PANN constitutive model for anisotropic hyperelasticity based on triclinic invariants and group symmetrization. For finite symmetry groups, this model fulfills all common mechanical constitutive conditions a priori. (2) We propose a group symmetrization-based method for the construction of polyconvex invariants for finite symmetry groups. Based on this, we derive a new integrity basis for a tetragonal symmetry group and a new functional basis for a cubic symmetry group. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first polyconvex integrity or functional bases for symmetry groups characterized by structural tensors of order higher than two. (3) We provide an extensive introduction to the construction of polyconvex integrity and functional bases, which form the basis of polyconvex invariant-based constitutive models. We discuss polyconvex bases for triclinic, isotropic, transversely isotropic, monoclinic, rhombic, tetragonal, and cubic symmetry groups. (4) We benchmark the polyconvex PANN constitutive models with highly nonlinear homogenization data of cubic metamaterials.