Fucai Zhu

Jiaxin Shi, Xidong Zhang, Fucai Zhu et al.

We propose a 3D-thinking-guided co-training framework that enables vision-language-action (VLA) models to perform 3D spatial reasoning implicitly during action prediction. Our core insight is that 3D geometry perception and 3D spatial reasoning are distinct capabilities that can be disentangled and injected at different feature hierarchies. During training, three tightly coupled components work in concert primarily within the latent space: (1) To gain geometric priors, a latent 3D geometry perception module aligns intermediate visual features with a 3D foundation model, acquiring low-level geometric cues without architectural modifications to the VLM backbone. (2) Complementing this, an online 3D reasoning distillation module mitigates the prompt-induced reasoning gap via a shared reasoning anchor token. During 3D VLM co-training, this anchor is emitted as the first output token to robustly encode spatial priors. During VLA training, it serves as an input token inserted between the task and action instructions, transferring high-level spatial thinking from explicit teacher reasoning prompts to student action prompts without chain-of-thought text generation. (3) These disentangled geometric and reasoning features are then united by a spatially augmented action integration, which jointly injects them into the action-query tokens as hierarchical spatial conditions to prevent action shortcuts. At deployment, our method retains only its lightweight adapters to perform implicit 3D reasoning, discarding the 3D foundation model and the teacher branch used for supervision. Consequently, it operates purely on 2D images without 3D sensors, external models, or explicit text generation while preventing catastrophic forgetting of the pretrained VLM, achieving state-of-the-art performance on LIBERO, LIBERO-PLUS, SimplerEnv, and real-world manipulation tasks.

Yingxin Lai, Yafei Zhou, Fucai Zhu et al.

While rule-based reinforcement learning has recently catalyzed explicit reasoning in multimodal models, tactile reasoning remains largely underexplored. Existing tactile-language models primarily rely on supervised or contrastive objectives, which limits their capacity to ground predictions in physical evidence or rectify misleading visual priors. Tactile reasoning introduces two modality-specific challenges: the ordinal nature of physical attributes (e.g., hardness, roughness) and the cross-sensor distribution shifts inherent in optical tactile hardware. In this work, we introduce TouchReason-1M, a large-scale multimodal dataset comprising over 1M synchronized tactile pairs across four distinct sensors, and TouchReason-Bench, a rigorous framework for evaluating tactile perception and visual-tactile conflict resolution. Building upon these, we propose Touch-R1, a tactile reasoning MLLM based on Qwen2.5-VL-7B. Touch-R1 is trained via a tactile-grounded GRPO objective that combines ordinal-aware accuracy, cross-sensor physical consistency, structured-format control, and an input-side tactile grounding objective. Specifically, the tactile-use reward assigns credit only when authentic tactile inputs yield superior correctness relative to counterfactual controls where the tactile stream is removed, shuffled, or noise-masked. On TouchReason-Bench, Touch-R1-7B outperforms Octopi-13B by 18.4\% and GPT-4o by 24.7\% on average. Its structured reasoning traces reveal emergent behaviors of probing, comparison, and revision, demonstrating that R1-style reasoning can be effectively grounded in physical contact.