3.6IVJul 5, 2024Code
Unraveling Radiomics Complexity: Strategies for Optimal Simplicity in Predictive ModelingMahdi Ait Lhaj Loutfi, Teodora Boblea Podasca, Alex Zwanenburg et al.
Background: The high dimensionality of radiomic feature sets, the variability in radiomic feature types and potentially high computational requirements all underscore the need for an effective method to identify the smallest set of predictive features for a given clinical problem. Purpose: Develop a methodology and tools to identify and explain the smallest set of predictive radiomic features. Materials and Methods: 89,714 radiomic features were extracted from five cancer datasets: low-grade glioma, meningioma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and two renal cell carcinoma cohorts (n=2104). Features were categorized by computational complexity into morphological, intensity, texture, linear filters, and nonlinear filters. Models were trained and evaluated on each complexity level using the area under the curve (AUC). The most informative features were identified, and their importance was explained. The optimal complexity level and associated most informative features were identified using systematic statistical significance analyses and a false discovery avoidance procedure, respectively. Their predictive importance was explained using a novel tree-based method. Results: MEDimage, a new open-source tool, was developed to facilitate radiomic studies. Morphological features were optimal for MRI-based meningioma (AUC: 0.65) and low-grade glioma (AUC: 0.68). Intensity features were optimal for CECT-based renal cell carcinoma (AUC: 0.82) and CT-based NSCLC (AUC: 0.76). Texture features were optimal for MRI-based renal cell carcinoma (AUC: 0.72). Tuning the Hounsfield unit range improved results for CECT-based renal cell carcinoma (AUC: 0.86). Conclusion: Our proposed methodology and software can estimate the optimal radiomics complexity level for specific medical outcomes, potentially simplifying the use of radiomics in predictive modeling across various contexts.
10.6CVMay 25, 2021
A Geometry-Informed Deep Learning Framework for Ultra-Sparse 3D Tomographic Image ReconstructionLiyue Shen, Wei Zhao, Dante Capaldi et al.
Deep learning affords enormous opportunities to augment the armamentarium of biomedical imaging, albeit its design and implementation have potential flaws. Fundamentally, most deep learning models are driven entirely by data without consideration of any prior knowledge, which dramatically increases the complexity of neural networks and limits the application scope and model generalizability. Here we establish a geometry-informed deep learning framework for ultra-sparse 3D tomographic image reconstruction. We introduce a novel mechanism for integrating geometric priors of the imaging system. We demonstrate that the seamless inclusion of known priors is essential to enhance the performance of 3D volumetric computed tomography imaging with ultra-sparse sampling. The study opens new avenues for data-driven biomedical imaging and promises to provide substantially improved imaging tools for various clinical imaging and image-guided interventions.
2.6CVNov 23, 2019
Atlas Based Segmentations via Semi-Supervised Diffeomorphic RegistrationsCharles Huang, Masoud Badiei, Hyunseok Seo et al.
Purpose: Segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) is a bottleneck in current radiation oncology pipelines and is often time consuming and labor intensive. In this paper, we propose an atlas-based semi-supervised registration algorithm to generate accurate segmentations of OARs for which there are ground truth contours and rough segmentations of all other OARs in the atlas. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use learning-based registration methods for the segmentation of head and neck patients and demonstrate its utility in clinical applications. Methods: Our algorithm cascades rigid and deformable deformation blocks, and takes on an atlas image (M), set of atlas-space segmentations (S_A), and a patient image (F) as inputs, while outputting patient-space segmentations of all OARs defined on the atlas. We train our model on 475 CT images taken from public archives and Stanford RadOnc Clinic (SROC), validate on 5 CT images from SROC, and test our model on 20 CT images from SROC. Results: Our method outperforms current state of the art learning-based registration algorithms and achieves an overall dice score of 0.789 on our test set. Moreover, our method yields a performance comparable to manual segmentation and supervised segmentation, while solving a much more complex registration problem. Whereas supervised segmentation methods only automate the segmentation process for a select few number of OARs, we demonstrate that our methods can achieve similar performance for OARs of interest, while also providing segmentations for every other OAR on the provided atlas. Conclusions: Our proposed algorithm has significant clinical applications and could help reduce the bottleneck for segmentation of head and neck OARs. Further, our results demonstrate that semi-supervised diffeomorphic registration can be accurately applied to both registration and segmentation problems.