Keya Prakash

Thomas A. Henzinger, Keya Prakash, K. S. Thejaswini

In automata theory, while determinisation provides a standard route to solving many common problems in automata theory, some weak forms of nondeterminism can be dealt with in some problems without costly determinisation. For example, the handling of specifications given by nondeterministic automata over infinite words for the problems of reactive synthesis or runtime verification requires resolving nondeterministic choices without knowing the future of the input word. We define and study classes of $ω$-regular automata for which the nondeterminism can be resolved by a policy that uses a combination of memory and randomness on any input word, based solely on the prefix read so far. We examine two settings for providing the input word to an automaton. In the first setting, called adversarial resolvability, the input word is constructed letter-by-letter by an adversary, dependent on the resolver's previous decisions. In the second setting, called stochastic resolvability, the adversary pre-commits to an infinite word and reveals it letter-by-letter. In each setting, we require the existence of an almost-sure resolver, i.e., a policy that ensures that as long as the adversary provides a word in the language of the underlying nondeterministic automaton, the run constructed by the policy is accepting with probability 1. The class of automata that are adversarially resolvable is the well-studied class of history-deterministic automata. The case of stochastically resolvable automata, on the other hand, defines a novel class. Restricting the class of resolvers in both settings to stochastic policies without memory introduces two additional new classes of automata. We show that the new automaton classes offer interesting trade-offs between succinctness, expressivity, and computational complexity, providing a fine gradation between deterministic automata and nondeterministic automata.

Udi Boker, Thomas A. Henzinger, Karoliina Lehtinen et al.

An automaton is history-deterministic if its nondeterminism can be resolved on the fly, only using the prefix of the word read so far. This mild form of nondeterminism has attracted particular attention for its applications in synthesis problems. An automaton $A$ is guidable with respect to a class $C$ of automata if it can fairly simulate every automaton in $C$ whose language is contained in that of $A$. In other words, guidable automata are those for which inclusion and simulation coincide, making them particularly interesting for model-checking. We study the connection between these two notions, and specifically the question of when they coincide. For classes of automata on which they do, deciding guidability, an otherwise challenging decision problem, reduces to deciding history-determinism, a problem that is starting to be well-understood for many classes. We provide a selection of sufficient criteria for a class of automata to guarantee the coincidence of the notions, and use them to show that the notions coincide for the most common automata classes, among which are $ω$-regular automata and many infinite-state automata with safety and reachability acceptance conditions, including vector addition systems with states, one-counter nets, pushdown-, Parikh-, and timed-automata. We also demonstrate that history-determinism and guidability do not always coincide, for example, for the classes of timed automata with a fixed number of clocks.

Keya Prakash, K. S. Thejaswini

We consider the model of history-deterministic one-counter nets (OCNs). History-determinism is a property of transition systems that allows for a limited kind of non-determinism which can be resolved 'on-the-fly'. Token games, which have been used to characterise history-determinism over various models, also characterise history-determinism over OCNs. By reducing 1-token games to simulation games, we are able to show that checking for history-determinism of OCNs is decidable. Moreover, we prove that this problem is PSPACE-complete for a unary encoding of transitions, and EXPSPACE-complete for a binary encoding. We then study the language properties of history-deterministic OCNs. We show that the resolvers of non-determinism for history-deterministic OCNs are eventually periodic. As a consequence, for a given history-deterministic OCN, we construct a language equivalent deterministic one-counter automaton. We also show the decidability of comparing languages of history-deterministic OCNs, such as language inclusion and language universality.

Antonio Casares, Keya Prakash, K. S. Thejaswini

We describe a history-deterministic Büchi automaton that has strictly less states than every language-equivalent deterministic Büchi automaton. This solves a problem that had been open since the introduction of history-determinism and actively investigated for over a decade. Our example automaton has 65 states, and proving its succinctness requires the combination of theoretical insights together with the aid of computers.

Antonio Casares, Olivier Idir, Denis Kuperberg et al.

We present a polynomial-time algorithm minimising the number of states of history-deterministic generalised coBüchi automata, building on the work of Abu Radi and Kupferman on coBüchi automata. On the other hand, we establish that the minimisation problem for both deterministic and history-deterministic generalised Büchi automata is NP-complete, as well as the problem of minimising at the same time the number of states and colours of history-deterministic generalised coBüchi automata.

Rohan Acharya, Marcin Jurdziński, Keya Prakash

Our main technical contribution is a polynomial-time determinisation procedure for history-deterministic Büchi automata, which settles an open question of Kuperberg and Skrzypczak, 2015. A key conceptual contribution is the lookahead game, which is a variant of Bagnol and Kuperberg's token game, in which Adam is given a fixed lookahead. We prove that the lookahead game is equivalent to the 1-token game. This allows us to show that the 1-token game characterises history-determinism for semantically-deterministic Büchi automata, which paves the way to our polynomial-time determinisation procedure.

Karoliina Lehtinen, Keya Prakash

History-determinism is a restricted notion of nondeterminism in automata, where the nondeterminism can be successfully resolved based solely on the prefix read so far. History-deterministic automata still allow for exponential succinctness in automata over infinite words compared to deterministic automata (Kuperberg and Skrzypczak, 2015), allow for canonical forms unlike deterministic automata (Abu Radi and Kupferman, 2019 and 2020; Ehlers and Schewe, 2022), and retain some of the algorithmic properties of deterministic automata, for example for reactive synthesis (Henzinger and Piterman, 2006; Ehlers and Khalimov, 2024). Despite the topic of history-determinism having received a lot of attention over the last decade, the complexity of deciding whether a parity automaton is history-deterministic has, up till now, remained open. We show that history-determinism for a parity automaton with a fixed parity index can be checked in PTIME, thus improving upon the naive EXPTIME upper bound of Henzinger and Piterman that has stood since 2006. More precisely, we show that the so-called 2-token game, which can be solved in PTIME for parity automata with a fixed parity index, characterises history-determinism for parity automata. This game was introduced by Bagnol and Kuperberg in 2018, who showed that to decide if a Büchi automaton is history-determinism, it suffices to find the winner of the 2-token game on it. They conjectured that this 2-token game based characterisation extends to parity automata. Boker, Kuperberg, Lehtinen, and Skrzypcak showed in 2020 that this conjecture holds for coBüchi automata as well. We prove Bagnol and Kuperberg's conjecture that the winner of the 2-token game characterises history-determinism on parity automata.

Keya Prakash

History-deterministic automata are a restricted class of nondeterministic automata where the nondeterminism while reading an input can be resolved successfully based on the prefix read so far. History-deterministic automata are exponentially more succinct than deterministic automata, while still retaining some of the algorithmic properties of deterministic automata, especially in the context of reactive synthesis. This thesis focuses on the problem of checking history-determinism for parity automata. Our main result is the 2-token theorem, due to which we obtain that checking history-determinism for parity automata with a fixed parity index can be checked in PTIME. This improves the naive EXPTIME upper bound of Henzinger and Piterman that has stood since 2006. More precisely, we show that the so-called 2-token game, which can be solved in PTIME for parity automata with a fixed parity index, characterises history-determinism for parity automata. This game was introduced by Bagnol and Kuperberg in 2018, who showed that to decide if a Büchi automaton is history-deterministic, it suffices to find the winner of the 2-token game on it. They conjectured that this 2-token game based characterisation of history-determinism extends to parity automata. We prove Bagnol and Kuperberg's conjecture that the winner of the 2-token game characterises history-determinism on parity automata. We also give a polynomial time determinisation procedure for history-deterministic Büchi automata, thus solving an open problem of Kuperberg and Skrzypczak from 2015. This result is a consequence of our proof of the 2-token theorem. Finally, we also show NP-hardness for the problem of checking history-determinism for parity automata when the parity index is not fixed. This is an improvement from the lower bound of solving parity games shown by Kuperberg and Skrzypczak in 2015.

Keya Prakash

We show that the problem of checking if a given nondeterministic parity automaton simulates another given nondeterministic parity automaton is NP-hard. We then adapt the techniques used for this result to show that the problem of checking history-determinism for a given parity automaton is NP-hard. This is an improvement from Kuperberg and Skrzypczak's previous lower bound of solving parity games from 2015. We also show that deciding if Eve wins the one-token game or the two-token game of a given parity automaton is NP-hard. Finally, we show that the problem of deciding if the language of a nondeterministic parity automaton is contained in the language of a history-deterministic parity automaton can be solved in quasi-polynomial time.