Brian Ondov

Kush Attal, Brian Ondov, Dina Demner-Fushman

Though exponentially growing health-related literature has been made available to a broad audience online, the language of scientific articles can be difficult for the general public to understand. Therefore, adapting this expert-level language into plain language versions is necessary for the public to reliably comprehend the vast health-related literature. Deep Learning algorithms for automatic adaptation are a possible solution; however, gold standard datasets are needed for proper evaluation. Proposed datasets thus far consist of either pairs of comparable professional- and general public-facing documents or pairs of semantically similar sentences mined from such documents. This leads to a trade-off between imperfect alignments and small test sets. To address this issue, we created the Plain Language Adaptation of Biomedical Abstracts dataset. This dataset is the first manually adapted dataset that is both document- and sentence-aligned. The dataset contains 750 adapted abstracts, totaling 7643 sentence pairs. Along with describing the dataset, we benchmark automatic adaptation on the dataset with state-of-the-art Deep Learning approaches, setting baselines for future research.

William Xia, Ishita Unde, Brian Ondov et al.

Online medical literature has made health information more available than ever, however, the barrier of complex medical jargon prevents the general public from understanding it. Though parallel and comparable corpora for Biomedical Text Simplification have been introduced, these conflate the many syntactic and lexical operations involved in simplification. To enable more targeted development and evaluation, we present a fine-grained lexical simplification task and dataset, Jargon Explanations for Biomedical Simplification (JEBS, https://github.com/bill-from-ri/JEBS-data ). The JEBS task involves identifying complex terms, classifying how to replace them, and generating replacement text. The JEBS dataset contains 21,595 replacements for 10,314 terms across 400 biomedical abstracts and their manually simplified versions. Additionally, we provide baseline results for a variety of rule-based and transformer-based systems for the three sub-tasks. The JEBS task, data, and baseline results pave the way for development and rigorous evaluation of systems for replacing or explaining complex biomedical terms.