Chun-Wei Wu

Chunwei Wu, Guitao Cao, Yan Li et al.

Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA), where only a pre-trained source model is used to adapt to the target distribution, is a more general approach to achieving domain adaptation in the real world. However, it can be challenging to capture the inherent structure of the target features accurately due to the lack of supervised information on the target domain. By analyzing the clustering performance of the target features, we show that they still contain core features related to discriminative attributes but lack the collation of semantic information. Inspired by this insight, we present Chaos to Order (CtO), a novel approach for SFDA that strives to constrain semantic credibility and propagate label information among target subpopulations. CtO divides the target data into inner and outlier samples based on the adaptive threshold of the learning state, customizing the learning strategy to fit the data properties best. Specifically, inner samples are utilized for learning intra-class structure thanks to their relatively well-clustered properties. The low-density outlier samples are regularized by input consistency to achieve high accuracy with respect to the ground truth labels. In CtO, by employing different learning strategies to propagate the labels from the inner local to outlier instances, it clusters the global samples from chaos to order. We further adaptively regulate the neighborhood affinity of the inner samples to constrain the local semantic credibility. In theoretical and empirical analyses, we demonstrate that our algorithm not only propagates from inner to outlier but also prevents local clustering from forming spurious clusters. Empirical evidence demonstrates that CtO outperforms the state of the arts on three public benchmarks: Office-31, Office-Home, and VisDA.

Fengqi Zhu, Rongzhen Wang, Shen Nie et al.

While Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs), such as LLaDA, present a promising paradigm for language modeling, there has been relatively little effort in aligning these models with human preferences via reinforcement learning. The challenge primarily arises from the high variance in Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO)-based likelihood estimates required for preference optimization. To address this issue, we propose Variance-Reduced Preference Optimization (VRPO), a framework that formally analyzes the variance of ELBO estimators and derives bounds on both the bias and variance of preference optimization gradients. Building on this theoretical foundation, we introduce unbiased variance reduction strategies, including optimal Monte Carlo budget allocation and antithetic sampling, that significantly improve the performance of MDM alignment. We demonstrate the effectiveness of VRPO by applying it to LLaDA, and the resulting model, LLaDA 1.5, outperforms its SFT-only predecessor consistently and significantly across mathematical (GSM8K +4.7), code (HumanEval +3.0, MBPP +1.8), and alignment benchmarks (IFEval +4.0, Arena-Hard +4.3). Furthermore, LLaDA 1.5 demonstrates a highly competitive mathematical performance compared to strong language MDMs and ARMs. Project page: https://ml-gsai.github.io/LLaDA-1.5-Demo/.

Zuoli Tang, Junjie Ou, Kaiqin Hu et al.

Recent years have witnessed significant progress in large language models' (LLMs) reasoning, which is largely due to the chain-of-thought (CoT) approaches, allowing models to generate intermediate reasoning steps before reaching the final answer. Building on these advances, state-of-the-art LLMs are instruction-tuned to provide long and detailed CoT pathways when responding to reasoning-related questions. However, human beings are naturally cognitive misers and will prompt language models to give rather short responses, thus raising a significant conflict with CoT reasoning. In this paper, we delve into how LLMs' reasoning performance changes when users provide short-path prompts. The results and analysis reveal that language models can reason effectively and robustly without explicit CoT prompts, while under short-path prompting, LLMs' reasoning ability drops significantly and becomes unstable, even on grade-school problems. To address this issue, we propose two approaches: an instruction-guided approach and a fine-tuning approach, both designed to effectively manage the conflict. Experimental results show that both methods achieve high accuracy, providing insights into the trade-off between instruction adherence and reasoning accuracy in current models.