14.6LGMar 14, 2022
Continual Learning for Multivariate Time Series Tasks with Variable Input DimensionsVibhor Gupta, Jyoti Narwariya, Pankaj Malhotra et al.
We consider a sequence of related multivariate time series learning tasks, such as predicting failures for different instances of a machine from time series of multi-sensor data, or activity recognition tasks over different individuals from multiple wearable sensors. We focus on two under-explored practical challenges arising in such settings: (i) Each task may have a different subset of sensors, i.e., providing different partial observations of the underlying 'system'. This restriction can be due to different manufacturers in the former case, and people wearing more or less measurement devices in the latter (ii) We are not allowed to store or re-access data from a task once it has been observed at the task level. This may be due to privacy considerations in the case of people, or legal restrictions placed by machine owners. Nevertheless, we would like to (a) improve performance on subsequent tasks using experience from completed tasks as well as (b) continue to perform better on past tasks, e.g., update the model and improve predictions on even the first machine after learning from subsequently observed ones. We note that existing continual learning methods do not take into account variability in input dimensions arising due to different subsets of sensors being available across tasks, and struggle to adapt to such variable input dimensions (VID) tasks. In this work, we address this shortcoming of existing methods. To this end, we learn task-specific generative models and classifiers, and use these to augment data for target tasks. Since the input dimensions across tasks vary, we propose a novel conditioning module based on graph neural networks to aid a standard recurrent neural network. We evaluate the efficacy of the proposed approach on three publicly available datasets corresponding to two activity recognition tasks (classification) and one prognostics task (regression).
0.8CLApr 19, 2022
Unsupervised Numerical Reasoning to Extract Phenotypes from Clinical Text by Leveraging External KnowledgeAshwani Tanwar, Jingqing Zhang, Julia Ive et al.
Extracting phenotypes from clinical text has been shown to be useful for a variety of clinical use cases such as identifying patients with rare diseases. However, reasoning with numerical values remains challenging for phenotyping in clinical text, for example, temperature 102F representing Fever. Current state-of-the-art phenotyping models are able to detect general phenotypes, but perform poorly when they detect phenotypes requiring numerical reasoning. We present a novel unsupervised methodology leveraging external knowledge and contextualized word embeddings from ClinicalBERT for numerical reasoning in a variety of phenotypic contexts. Comparing against unsupervised benchmarks, it shows a substantial performance improvement with absolute gains on generalized Recall and F1 scores up to 79% and 71%, respectively. In the supervised setting, it also surpasses the performance of alternative approaches with absolute gains on generalized Recall and F1 scores up to 70% and 44%, respectively.
2.9CLJul 16, 2023
The Potential and Pitfalls of using a Large Language Model such as ChatGPT or GPT-4 as a Clinical AssistantJingqing Zhang, Kai Sun, Akshay Jagadeesh et al.
Recent studies have demonstrated promising performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on several medical domain tasks. However, none have assessed its performance using a large-scale real-world electronic health record database, nor have evaluated its utility in providing clinical diagnostic assistance for patients across a full range of disease presentation. We performed two analyses using ChatGPT and GPT-4, one to identify patients with specific medical diagnoses using a real-world large electronic health record database and the other, in providing diagnostic assistance to healthcare workers in the prospective evaluation of hypothetical patients. Our results show that GPT-4 across disease classification tasks with chain of thought and few-shot prompting can achieve performance as high as 96% F1 scores. For patient assessment, GPT-4 can accurately diagnose three out of four times. However, there were mentions of factually incorrect statements, overlooking crucial medical findings, recommendations for unnecessary investigations and overtreatment. These issues coupled with privacy concerns, make these models currently inadequate for real world clinical use. However, limited data and time needed for prompt engineering in comparison to configuration of conventional machine learning workflows highlight their potential for scalability across healthcare applications.
0.6CLMay 24, 2022
Medical Scientific Table-to-Text Generation with Human-in-the-Loop under the Data Sparsity ConstraintHeng-Yi Wu, Jingqing Zhang, Julia Ive et al.
Structured (tabular) data in the preclinical and clinical domains contains valuable information about individuals and an efficient table-to-text summarization system can drastically reduce manual efforts to condense this data into reports. However, in practice, the problem is heavily impeded by the data paucity, data sparsity and inability of the state-of-the-art natural language generation models (including T5, PEGASUS and GPT-Neo) to produce accurate and reliable outputs. In this paper, we propose a novel table-to-text approach and tackle these problems with a novel two-step architecture which is enhanced by auto-correction, copy mechanism and synthetic data augmentation. The study shows that the proposed approach selects salient biomedical entities and values from structured data with improved precision (up to 0.13 absolute increase) of copying the tabular values to generate coherent and accurate text for assay validation reports and toxicology reports. Moreover, we also demonstrate a light-weight adaptation of the proposed system to new datasets by fine-tuning with as little as 40\% training examples. The outputs of our model are validated by human experts in the Human-in-the-Loop scenario.
0.6CLMay 18, 2022
A Scalable Workflow to Build Machine Learning Classifiers with Clinician-in-the-Loop to Identify Patients in Specific DiseasesJingqing Zhang, Atri Sharma, Luis Bolanos et al.
Clinicians may rely on medical coding systems such as International Classification of Diseases (ICD) to identify patients with diseases from Electronic Health Records (EHRs). However, due to the lack of detail and specificity as well as a probability of miscoding, recent studies suggest the ICD codes often cannot characterise patients accurately for specific diseases in real clinical practice, and as a result, using them to find patients for studies or trials can result in high failure rates and missing out on uncoded patients. Manual inspection of all patients at scale is not feasible as it is highly costly and slow. This paper proposes a scalable workflow which leverages both structured data and unstructured textual notes from EHRs with techniques including NLP, AutoML and Clinician-in-the-Loop mechanism to build machine learning classifiers to identify patients at scale with given diseases, especially those who might currently be miscoded or missed by ICD codes. Case studies in the MIMIC-III dataset were conducted where the proposed workflow demonstrates a higher classification performance in terms of F1 scores compared to simply using ICD codes on gold testing subset to identify patients with Ovarian Cancer (0.901 vs 0.814), Lung Cancer (0.859 vs 0.828), Cancer Cachexia (0.862 vs 0.650), and Lupus Nephritis (0.959 vs 0.855). Also, the proposed workflow that leverages unstructured notes consistently outperforms the baseline that uses structured data only with an increase of F1 (Ovarian Cancer 0.901 vs 0.719, Lung Cancer 0.859 vs 0.787, Cancer Cachexia 0.862 vs 0.838 and Lupus Nephritis 0.959 vs 0.785). Experiments on the large testing set also demonstrate the proposed workflow can find more patients who are miscoded or missed by ICD codes. Moreover, interpretability studies are also conducted to clinically validate the top impact features of the classifiers.