Larisa Ivanova

Rahul Sharma, Lars Henrich, Larisa Ivanova et al.

Secondary school students increasingly encounter AI systems whose outputs depend on data quality, evaluation choices and modeling assumptions. To provide accessible entry points to these interconnected concepts, we developed KI-Adventskalender, a free web-based extracurricular initiative with 24 didactically curated, short, guided micro-challenges released daily in December, targeting data-centric competencies and socio-technical themes that shape how data are interpreted in practice. Drawing on two annual iterations, we report aggregate platform traces characterizing participation and task-level engagement. Participation increased substantially in 2025, but early attrition persists. Progression stabilized after midpoint: among users reaching Day 12 in 2025, more than 75% completed the calendar. Competence cluster performance shifted across years; higher revision rates co-occurred with strong pass rates, suggesting sustained engagement. We use these observations to motivate a next-step measurement agenda: tighter task instrumentation, embedded micro-assessments and mixed-method evaluation designs that can distinguish persistence from conceptual uptake, knowledge progression and durable learning outcomes.

Gerrit Großmann, Larisa Ivanova, Sai Leela Poduru et al.

According to Yuval Noah Harari, large-scale human cooperation is driven by shared narratives that encode common beliefs and values. This study explores whether such narratives can similarly nudge LLM agents toward collaboration. We use a finitely repeated public goods game in which LLM agents choose either cooperative or egoistic spending strategies. We prime agents with stories highlighting teamwork to different degrees and test how this influences negotiation outcomes. Our experiments explore four questions:(1) How do narratives influence negotiation behavior? (2) What differs when agents share the same story versus different ones? (3) What happens when the agent numbers grow? (4) Are agents resilient against self-serving negotiators? We find that story-based priming significantly affects negotiation strategies and success rates. Common stories improve collaboration, benefiting each agent. By contrast, priming agents with different stories reverses this effect, and those agents primed toward self-interest prevail. We hypothesize that these results carry implications for multi-agent system design and AI alignment.