Michel Make

2papers

2 Papers

CEMar 20, 2019
Simplex space-time meshes in thermally coupled two-phase flow simulations of mold filling

Violeta Karyofylli, Loic Wendling, Michel Make et al.

The quality of plastic parts produced through injection molding depends on many factors. Especially during the filling stage, defects such as weld lines, burrs, or insufficient filling can occur. Numerical methods need to be employed to improve product quality by means of predicting and simulating the injection molding process. In the current work, a highly viscous incompressible non-isothermal two-phase flow is simulated, which takes place during the cavity filling. The injected melt exhibits a shear-thinning behavior, which is described by the Carreau-WLF model. Besides that, a novel discretization method is used in the context of 4D simplex space-time grids [2]. This method allows for local temporal refinement in the vicinity of, e.g., the evolving front of the melt [10]. Utilizing such an adaptive refinement can lead to locally improved numerical accuracy while maintaining the highest possible computational efficiency in the remaining of the domain. For demonstration purposes, a set of 2D and 3D benchmark cases, that involve the filling of various cavities with a distributor, are presented.

NAApr 11, 2019
Space-Time NURBS-Enhanced Finite Elements for Solving the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations

Michel Make, Norbert Hosters, Marek Behr et al.

This article considers the NURBS-Enhanced Finite Element Method (NEFEM) applied to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. NEFEM, in contrast to conventional finite element formulations, utilizes a NURBS-based computational domain representation. Such representations are typically available from Computer-Aided-Design tools. Within the NEFEM, the NURBS boundary definition is utilized only for elements that are touching the domain boundaries. The remaining interior of the domain is discretized using standard finite elements. Contrary to isogeometric analysis, no volume splines are necessary. The key technical features of NEFEM will be discussed in detail, followed by a set of numerical examples that are used to compare NEFEM against conventional finite element methods with the focus on compressible flow.