Florian Kühnlenz

Pedro H. J. Nardelli, Hirley Alves, Antti Pinomaa et al.

This paper investigates the possibility of building the Energy Internet via a packetized management of non-industrial loads. The proposed solution is based on the cyber-physical implementation of energy packets where flexible loads send use requests to an energy server. Based on the existing literature, we explain how and why this approach could scale up to interconnected micro-grids, also pointing out the challenges involved in relation to the physical deployment of electricity network. We then assess how machine-type wireless communications, as part of 5G and beyond systems, will achieve the low latency and ultra reliability needed by the micro-grid protection while providing the massive coverage needed by the packetized management. This more distributed grid organization also requires localized governance models. We cite few existing examples as local markets, energy communities and micro-operator that support such novel arrangements. We close the paper by providing an overview of ongoing activities that support the proposed vision and possible ways to move forward.

Florian Kühnlenz, Pedro H. J. Nardelli, Santtu Karhinen et al.

This paper proposes an agent-based model that combines both spot and balancing electricity markets. From this model, we develop a multi-agent simulation to study the integration of the consumers' flexibility into the system. Our study identifies the conditions that real-time prices may lead to higher electricity costs, which in turn contradicts the usual claim that such a pricing scheme reduces cost. We show that such undesirable behavior is in fact systemic. Due to the existing structure of the wholesale market, the predicted demand that is used in the formation of the price is never realized since the flexible users will change their demand according to such established price. As the demand is never correctly predicted, the volume traded through the balancing markets increases, leading to higher overall costs. In this case, the system can sustain, and even benefit from, a small number of flexible users, but this solution can never upscale without increasing the total costs. To avoid this problem, we implement the so-called "exclusive groups." Our results illustrate the importance of rethinking the current practices so that flexibility can be successfully integrated considering scenarios with and without intermittent renewable sources.

Pedro H. J. Nardelli, Florian Kühnlenz

This article discusses unexpected consequences of idealistic conceptions about the modernization of power grids. We will focus our analysis on demand-response policies based on automatic decisions by the so-called smart home appliances. Following the usual design approach, each individual appliance has access to a universal signal (e.g. grid frequency or electricity price) that is believed to indicate the system state. Such information is then used as the basis of the appliances' individual decisions. While each single device has a negligible impact in the system, the aggregate effect of the distributed appliances' reactions is expect to bring improvements in the system efficiency; this effect is the demand-response policy goal. The smartness of such an ideal system, composed by isolated appliances with their individual decisions, but connected in the same physical grid, may worsen the system stability. This first-sight undesirable outcome comes as a consequence of synchronization among agents that are subject to the same signal. We argue that this effect is in fact byproduct of methodological choices, which are many times implicit. To support this claim, we employ a different approach that understands the electricity system as constituted by physical, informational and regulatory (networked and structured) layers that cannot be reduced to only one or two of them, but have to be viewed as an organic whole. By classifying its structure under this lens, more appropriate management tools can be designed by looking at the system totality in action. Two examples are provided to illustrate the strength of this modeling.

Pedro H. J. Nardelli, Florian Kühnlenz

This document provides a theoretical-methodological ground to sustain the idea that the IoT builds the structure of awareness of large-scale infrastructures viewed as techno-social cyber-physical systems, which are special cases of self-developing reflexive-active systems. As the last phrase already indicates, we need to go through a series of explanations before reaching the point of being capable of analyzing the dynamics of IoT-based systems, constituted by physical, information and regulatory layers. We expect through this text to clarify what is the structure of awareness by revisiting the little known Lefebvre's notation. From this standpoint, we can analytically show systemic differences that appears when agents using information about the physical system and/or about the other agents (re)act within the system itself, determining then the actually realized system dynamics. We provide an example of how to carry out this kind of research using the example of smart appliances as a form of stabilizing the grid frequency.

Florian Kühnlenz, Pedro H. J. Nardelli

This paper proposes a simple model to capture the complexity of multi-layer systems where their constituent layers affect, are affected by, each other. The physical layer is a circuit composed by a power source and resistors in parallel. Individual agents can add, remove or keep the resistors they have, and their decisions aiming at maximising the delivered power - a non-linear function dependent on the others' behaviour - based on their internal state, their global state perception, the information received from their neighbours in the communication network, and a randomised selfishness. We develop an agent-based simulation to analyse the effects of number of agents (size of the system), communication network topology, communication errors and the minimum power gain that triggers a behavioural change. Our results show that a wave-like behaviour at macro-level (caused by individual changes in the decision layer) can only emerge for a specific system size, the ratio between cooperators and defectors depends on minimum gain assumed - lower minimal gains lead to less cooperation and vice-versa, different communication network topologies lead to different levels of power utilisation and fairness at the physical layer, and a certain level of error in the communication layer leads to more cooperation.