Mateusz Michałek

2papers

2 Papers

NASep 6, 2018
Complex best $r$-term approximations almost always exist in finite dimensions

Yang Qi, Mateusz Michałek, Lek-Heng Lim

We show that in finite-dimensional nonlinear approximations, the best $r$-term approximant of a function $f$ almost always exists over $\mathbb{C}$ but that the same is not true over $\mathbb{R}$, i.e., the infimum $\inf_{f_1,\dots,f_r \in Y} \lVert f - f_1 - \dots - f_r \rVert$ is almost always attainable by complex-valued functions $f_1,\dots, f_r$ in $Y$, a set of functions that have some desired structures. Our result extends to functions that possess special properties like symmetry or skew-symmetry under permutations of arguments. For the case where $Y$ is the set of separable functions, the problem becomes that of best rank-$r$ tensor approximations. We show that over $\mathbb{C}$, any tensor almost always has a unique best rank-$r$ approximation. This extends to other notions of tensor ranks such as symmetric rank and alternating rank, to best $r$-block-terms approximations, and to best approximations by tensor networks. When applied to sparse-plus-low-rank approximations, we obtain that for any given $r$ and $k$, a general tensor has a unique best approximation by a sum of a rank-$r$ tensor and a $k$-sparse tensor with a fixed sparsity pattern; this arises in, for example, estimation of covariance matrices of a Gaussian hidden variable model with $k$ observed variables conditionally independent given $r$ hidden variables. The existential (but not the uniqueness) part of our result also applies to best approximations by a sum of a rank-$r$ tensor and a $k$-sparse tensor with no fixed sparsity pattern, as well as to tensor completion problems.

AGAug 7, 2015
Hackbusch Conjecture on tensor formats

Weronika Buczyńska, Jarosław Buczyński, Mateusz Michałek

We prove a conjecture of W. Hackbusch about tensor network states related to a perfect binary tree and train track tree. Tensor network states are used to present seemingly complicated tensors in a relatively simple and efficient manner. Each such presentation is described by a binary tree and a collection of vector spaces, one for each vertex of the tree. A problem suggested by Wolfgang Hackbusch and Joseph Landsberg is to compare the complexities of encodings, if one presents the same tensor with respect to two different trees. We answer this question when the two trees are extremal cases: the most "spread" tree (perfect binary tree), and the "deepest" binary tree (train track tree). The corresponding tensor formats are called hierarchical formats (HF) and tensor train (TT) formats, respectively.