Basilio Gentile

Dario Paccagnan, Basilio Gentile, Francesca Parise et al.

We consider the framework of aggregative games, in which the cost function of each agent depends on his own strategy and on the average population strategy. As first contribution, we investigate the relations between the concepts of Nash and Wardrop equilibrium. By exploiting a characterization of the two equilibria as solutions of variational inequalities, we bound their distance with a decreasing function of the population size. As second contribution, we propose two decentralized algorithms that converge to such equilibria and are capable of coping with constraints coupling the strategies of different agents. Finally, we study the applications of charging of electric vehicles and of route choice on a road network.

Francesca Parise, Basilio Gentile, John Lygeros

We consider the framework of average aggregative games, where the cost function of each agent depends on his own strategy and on the average population strategy. We focus on the case in which the agents are coupled not only via their cost functions, but also via constraints coupling their strategies. We propose a distributed algorithm that achieves an almost Nash equilibrium by requiring only local communications of the agents, as specified by a sparse communication network. The proof of convergence of the algorithm relies on the auxiliary class of network aggregative games and exploits a novel result of parametric convergence of variational inequalities, which is applicable beyond the context of games. We apply our theoretical findings to a multi-market Cournot game with transportation costs and maximum market capacity.

Francesca Parise, Sergio Grammatico, Basilio Gentile et al.

We consider network aggregative games to model and study multi-agent populations in which each rational agent is influenced by the aggregate behavior of its neighbors, as specified by an underlying network. Specifically, we examine systems where each agent minimizes a quadratic cost function, that depends on its own strategy and on a convex combination of the strategies of its neighbors, and is subject to personalized convex constraints. We analyze the best response dynamics and we propose alternative distributed algorithms to steer the strategies of the rational agents to a Nash equilibrium configuration. The convergence of these schemes is guaranteed under different sufficient conditions, depending on the matrices defining the cost and on the network. Additionally, we propose an extension to the network aggregative game setting that allows for multiple rounds of communications among the agents, and we illustrate how it can be combined with consensus theory to recover a solution to the mean field control problem in a distributed fashion, that is, without requiring the presence of a central coordinator. Finally, we apply our theoretical findings to study a novel multi-dimensional, convex-constrained model of opinion dynamics and a hierarchical demand-response scheme for energy management in smart buildings, extending literature results.